SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Published articles should not be dead and buried: introducing research updates
16 references·0 citing·47 second hopsampled
Published articles should not be dead and buried: introducing research updates (2010)Published articles should not be dead and…Updating Systematic Reviews: An International Survey (2010)Updating Systematic Reviews: …When and how to update systematic reviews (2008)When and how to update system…When and how to update systematic reviews (2007)When and how to update system…Post-publication review could aid skills and quality (2007)Post-publication review could…Limitations are not properly acknowledged in the scientific literature (2007)Limitations are not properly …An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings (2007)An exploratory test for an ex…A systematic review identified few methods and strategies describing when and how to update systematic reviews (2007)A systematic review identifie…ONE for All: The Next Step for PLoS (2006)ONE for All: The Next Step fo…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Unjustified Restrictions on Letters to the Editor (2005)Unjustified Restrictions on L…Lancet Correspondence: old letters, new rules (2003)Lancet Correspondence: old le…The Hidden Research Paper (2002)The Hidden Research PaperPoor-Quality Medical Research (2002)Poor-Quality Medical ResearchDiscussion Sections in Reports of Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals (2002)Discussion Sections in Report…Letters to the Editor 1991 (1992)Letters to the Editor 1991Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap (2014)Screening and assessment tools for gaming disorder: A comprehensive systematic review (2020)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2016)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)The Cochrane Library (2005)The art and science of knowledge synthesis (2010)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)What five decades of research tells us about the effects of youth psychological therapy: A multilevel meta-analysis and implications for science and practice. (2017)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1998)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review (2002)Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method (2007)Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2007)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies (2013)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Science in Action (1987)When Authorship Fails (1997)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review (2007)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Quantifying Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2017)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,571 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,755 cited
  • 2007An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings756 cited
  • 2002Poor-Quality Medical Research296 cited
  • 2007Limitations are not properly acknowledged in the scientific literature180 cited
  • 2008When and how to update systematic reviews157 cited
  • 2002Discussion Sections in Reports of Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals126 cited
  • 2007A systematic review identified few methods and strategies describing when and how to update systematic reviews98 cited
  • 2002The Hidden Research Paper75 cited
  • 2010Updating Systematic Reviews: An International Survey62 cited
  • 2007When and how to update systematic reviews27 cited
  • 2006ONE for All: The Next Step for PLoS25 cited
  • 2005Unjustified Restrictions on Letters to the Editor17 cited
  • 1992Letters to the Editor 199116 cited
  • 2003Lancet Correspondence: old letters, new rules15 cited
  • 2007Post-publication review could aid skills and quality

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

10 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.