When Groups Meet: The Dynamics of Intergroup Contact

Thomas Fraser Pettigrew · Linda R. Tropp

709 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Social and Intergroup Psychology Social Power and Status Dynamics Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Abstract

1. The Origins of Intergroup Contact Theory. 2. Does Intergroup Contact Typically Reduce Intergroup Prejudice? 3. Do Intergroup Contact Effects Generalize? 4. Are the Effects of Intergroup Contact Universal? 5. When Does Intergroup Contact Reduce Prejudice? 6. How Does Intergroup Contact Reduce Prejudice? 7. Does Intergroup Contact Reduce All Aspects of Prejudice? 8. Does Cross-Group Friendship Play a Special Role in Reducing Prejudice? 9. Does Group Status Moderate Contact Effects? 10. Intergroup Contact as One of Many Predictors of Prejudice. 11. Criticisms of Intergroup Contact Theory. 12. When Intergroup Contact Fails. 13. Summing Up and Looking to the Future.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 709 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2015Can we really reduce ethnic prejudice outside the lab? A meta‐analysis of direct and indirect contact interventions 2014Preventing prejudice and improving intergroup attitudes: A meta-analysis of child and adolescent training programs 2014With malice toward none and charity for some: Ingroup favoritism enables discrimination.2013Intergroup contact as a tool for reducing, resolving, and preventing intergroup conflict: Evidence, limitations, and potential.2014Contextual effect of positive intergroup contact on outgroup prejudice 2015In Pursuit of Three Theories: Authoritarianism, Relative Deprivation, and Intergroup Contact 2014Negative intergroup contact is more influential, but positive intergroup contact is more common: Assessing contact prominence and contact prevalence in five Central European countries 2014Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious forms of indirect contact

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.