Stayers as "Workers" and "Savers": Toward Reconciling the Pension-Quit Literature

Abstract

The classic selection effect posits that deferred wages attract "stayers." The results in this paper suggest an alternative explanation. Deferred wage contracts attract "savers." All else constant, savers are better workers than nonsavers. A firm naturally works harder to retain better workers, and thus, is led to pay them higher wages; thereby encouraging savers to remain in the firm's employ. This process creates a confluence of deferred wages, high levels of compensation and low quit propensities. In this explanation, "staying" is merely the result of a selection process, and not the underlying factor that drives selection.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 56 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.