Evaluating Value-Added Models for Teacher Accountability
PsycEXTRA Dataset· 2003-01-01· dataset· 542 citationsclosed
School Choice and PerformanceEducational Assessment and ImprovementTeacher Education and Assessments
Abstract
Evaluates leading applications of VAM, clarifies questions raised by its use for measuring teacher effectiveness, and discusses a variety of statistical and measurement issues that might affect the validity of inferences resulting from use of the model.
Cite this
Daniel F. McCaffrey, John R. Lockwood Iii, Daniel M. Koretz, Laura S. Hamilton (2003). Evaluating Value-Added Models for Teacher Accountability. PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e658712010-001
@article{f2003evaluating,
title = {Evaluating Value-Added Models for Teacher Accountability},
author = {McCaffrey, Daniel F. and Iii, John R. Lockwood and Koretz, Daniel M. and Hamilton, Laura S.},
year = {2003},
journal = {PsycEXTRA Dataset},
doi = {10.1037/e658712010-001}
}Citations in this library
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 542 citations exist upstream.
References
2000Does Teacher Certification Matter? High School Teacher Certification Status and Student Achievement
1997Teacher and Classroom Context Effects on Student Achievement: Implications for Teacher Evaluation