Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine

16 references·16 citing·41 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
2000Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context2,307 cited
2001Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis2,229 cited
2000Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?811 cited
1991Validation of an index of the quality of review articles788 cited
2003The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews499 cited
2000What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses?454 cited
1991Agreement among reviewers of review articles283 cited
2000Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation263 cited
2000Mejora de la calidad de los informes de los metaanálisis de los ensayos clínicos controlados: el acuerdo QUOROM213 cited
1986A quality assessment of randomized control trials of primary treatment of breast cancer.195 cited
1998Guides for reading and interpreting systematic reviews: I. Getting started.170 cited
2003

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Should meta-analysts search Embase in addition to Medline?

160 cited

1998Guides for Reading and Interpreting Systematic Reviews135 cited

1995The Relationship Between Methodological Quality and Conclusions in Reviews of Spinal Manipulation132 cited

Cited by

2009Quality of systematic reviews in pediatric oncology – A systematic review78 cited
2015Quality of Conduct and Reporting of Meta-analyses of Surgical Interventions76 cited
2017Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study75 cited
2006Cochrane Skin Group systematic reviews are more methodologically rigorous than other systematic reviews in dermatology73 cited
2002Assessing the quality of reports of randomized trials in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine66 cited
2014Comparison of search strategies in systematic reviews of adverse effects to other systematic reviews55 cited
2006Optimizing search strategies to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE53 cited
2006Quality of Reporting of Randomized, Controlled Trials in Cerebral Palsy52 cited
2006Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?49 cited
2009AHRQ Series Paper 2: Principles for developing guidance: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program47 cited
2010Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture (1997–2007): An Assessment of Reporting Quality with a CONSORT‐ and STRICTA‐Based Instrument46 cited
2009Reporting and methodologic quality of Cochrane Neonatal review group systematic reviews46 cited
2009Building PROMIS item banks: librarians as co-investigators44 cited
2009The Quality of Meta-Analyses of Genetic Association Studies: A Review With Recommendations39 cited
2005Systematic reviews involving complementary and alternative medicine interventions had higher quality of reporting than conventional medicine reviews39 cited
2011Randomized controlled trials of herbal interventions underreport important details of the intervention38 cited