SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Increase in numbers and proportions of review articles in Tropical Medicine, Infectious Diseases, and oncology
14 references·0 citing·47 second hop
Increase in numbers and proportions of review articles in Tropical Medicine, Infectious Diseases, and oncology (2013)Increase in numbers and proportions of re…Counting citations in texts rather than reference lists to improve the accuracy of assessing scientific contribution (2011)Counting citations in texts r…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…Concentration of the Most-Cited Papers in the Scientific Literature: Analysis of Journal Ecosystems (2006)Concentration of the Most-Cit…Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study (2006)Compliance with QUOROM and qu…Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences (2005)Relative Citation Impact of V…Citation rates and perceptions of scientific contribution (2005)Citation rates and perception…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…Characteristics of highly cited papers (2003)Characteristics of highly cit…Journal production and journal impact factors (1996)Journal production and journa…Comprehensiveness and bias in reporting clinical trials. Study of reviews of pneumococcal vaccine effectiveness. (1995)Comprehensiveness and bias in…What are highly cited publications? A method applied to German scientific papers, 1980-1989 (1992)What are highly cited publica…Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Networks of Scientific PapersA comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies (2001)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Registration in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) of systematic review protocols was associated with increased review quality (2018)Editorial: Review Articles, Systematic Reviews, Meta-Analysis, and the Updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Guidelines (2021)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Registering systematic reviews (2009)From QUOROM to PRISMA: A Survey of High-Impact Medical Journals' Instructions to Authors and a Review of Systematic Reviews in Anesthesia Literature (2011)Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? – A systematic review of reviews: an update (2018)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)International ranking systems for universities and institutions: a critical appraisal (2007)How Trustworthy Is the Scientific Literature in Industrial and Organizational Psychology? (2013)Revisiting the “American Social Science”-Mapping the Geography of International Relations (2013)Oxford English dictionary (2004)The Oxford English Dictionary Online (2004)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization (2004)Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law (2005)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)Assessing basic research (1983)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation (2012)Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: a bibliometric analysis (2015)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? (1979)Problems of citation analysis: A critical review (1989)The skewness of science (1992)Researchers’ perceptions of citations (2009)How Citation Boosts Promote Scientific Paradigm Shifts and Nobel Prizes (2011)How status of research papers affects the way they are read and cited (2022)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies10,781 cited
  • 1965Networks of Scientific Papers3,124 cited
  • 2005Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences497 cited
  • 2003Characteristics of highly cited papers491 cited
  • 2006Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study149 cited
  • 2005Citation rates and perceptions of scientific contribution135 cited
  • 2006Concentration of the Most-Cited Papers in the Scientific Literature: Analysis of Journal Ecosystems121 cited
  • 2011Counting citations in texts rather than reference lists to improve the accuracy of assessing scientific contribution62 cited
  • 1996Journal production and journal impact factors52 cited
  • 1992What are highly cited publications? A method applied to German scientific papers, 1980-198924 cited
  • 1995Comprehensiveness and bias in reporting clinical trials. Study of reviews of pneumococcal vaccine effectiveness.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

16 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.