SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Why Are Federal Judges So Acquittal Prone
0 references·4 citing·12 second hop
Why Are Federal Judges So Acquittal Prone (2005)Why Are Federal Judges So Acquittal ProneThe Effects of Reference Dependence on Judicial Persuasion (2025)The Effects of Reference Depe…Definitivity Avoidance (2019)Definitivity AvoidanceSentencing Discretion and Burdens of Proof (2015)Sentencing Discretion and Bur…Judges and Juries: The Defense Case and Differences in Acquittal Rates (2008)Judges and Juries: The Defens…Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk (1979)Status quo bias in decision making (1988)The psychology of doing nothing: Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. (2003)The American Jury. (1967)An Economic Approach to the Law of Evidence (1999)A Social Psychology of Knowledge (2007)"Shouldn't we consider...?": Jury discussions of forbidden topics and effects on damage awards. (2008)Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments. (2014)Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision making (1999)Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle (1995)A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences (2006)Bayesian Persuasion (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2008Judges and Juries: The Defense Case and Differences in Acquittal Rates13 cited
  • 2015Sentencing Discretion and Burdens of Proof12 cited
  • 2019Definitivity Avoidance0 cited
  • 2025The Effects of Reference Dependence on Judicial Persuasion0 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work