SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Feasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery
8 references·1 citing·46 second hop
Feasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery (2015)Feasibility of individual patient data me…How to Make More Published Research True (2014)How to Make More Published Re…A failed attempt to conduct an individual patient data meta-analysis (2014)A failed attempt to conduct a…Assessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data: a database survey (2012)Assessment of publication bia…Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting (2010)Meta-analysis of individual p…Individual patient meta-analysis—rewards and challenges (2009)Individual patient meta-analy…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Evidence synthesis combining individual patient data and aggregate data: a systematic review identified current practice and possible methods (2007)Evidence synthesis combining …THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY FROM 1988 THROUGH 2000 (2002)THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF R…Statistical analyses and quality of individual participant data network meta-analyses were suboptimal: a cross-sectional study (2020)Statistical analyses and qual…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? (1993)To IPD or not to IPD? (2002)Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: a review of methods used in practice (2005)No Head-to-Head Trial? Simulate the Missing Arms (2010)Survey finds that most meta-analysts do not attempt to collect individual patient data (2012)The impact of individual patient data in a network meta‐analysis: An investigation into parameter estimation and model selection (2018)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Reproducible Research in Computational Science (2011)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The natural selection of bad science (2016)COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (2021)Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Overcoming obstacles in obtaining individual participant data for meta‐analysis (2016)Diagnostic accuracy of the Geriatric Depression Scale-30, Geriatric Depression Scale-15, Geriatric Depression Scale-5 and Geriatric Depression Scale-4 for detecting major depression: protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis (2018)Examining Ecological Constraints on the Intergenerational Transmission of Attachment Via Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis (2018)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening to detect major depression: individual participant data meta-analysis (2019)Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math (2020)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology (2015)Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: Guidance on Their Use (2015)Definitions, Foundations and Associations of Physical Literacy: A Systematic Review (2016)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)The Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trials Using a Surgical Intervention Is in Need of Immediate Improvement (2006)The reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in surgery: A systematic review (2007)The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings From Randomized Trials in Sports Surgery: A Systematic Survey (2016)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research (2000)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)An alternative model for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis when the within-study correlations are unknown (2007)Meta‐analysis of individual‐ and aggregate‐level data (2007)Prognostic markers in cancer: the evolution of evidence from single studies to meta-analysis, and beyond (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data (2015)The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (2015)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Updating the PRISMA reporting guideline for network meta-analysis: a scoping review (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2010Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting1,701 cited
  • 2014How to Make More Published Research True757 cited
  • 2012Assessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data: a database survey403 cited
  • 2002THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY FROM 1988 THROUGH 2000243 cited
  • 2007Evidence synthesis combining individual patient data and aggregate data: a systematic review identified current practice and possible methods195 cited
  • 2014A failed attempt to conduct an individual patient data meta-analysis35 cited
  • 2009Individual patient meta-analysis—rewards and challenges31 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Statistical analyses and quality of individual participant data network meta-analyses were suboptimal: a cross-sectional study17 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work