“They can't read, but they sure can count”

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this short paper is to focus on the parallel games of journal rankings and citation counts. Design/methodology/approach The paper analyses journal ranking and citation procedures. Findings Journal rankings can often reflect personal bias, and therefore can be flawed. Originality/value The paper highlights the differences in ranking journals and citations, globally.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 21 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.