SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Google Scholar as a Data Source for Research Assessment · Study

ChapterShelves

ChapterGoogle Scholar as a Data Source for Research Assessment

Emilio Delgado López‐Cózar2019

OA

Chaptergreen2019

Google Scholar as a Data Source for Research Assessment

Emilio Delgado López‐Cózar · Enrique Orduña‐Malea · Alberto Martín‐Martín

143 citations·0/0 files stored·Springer handbooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Library Science and Information Web visibility and informetrics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 143 citations exist upstream.

References

2015Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison 2007Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar 2014Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network 2015The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management 1964THE USE OF CITATION DATA IN WRITING THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE 1964"Science Citation Index"—A New Dimension in Indexing 2014The Number of Scholarly Documents on the Public Web 2011Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis

Cited by

2021Counting methods introduced into the bibliometric research literature 1970–2018: A review 2021Using Conventional Bibliographic Databases for Social Science Research: Web of Science and Scopus are not the Only Options 2021Intelligent Cognitive Assistants for Attitude and Behavior Change Support in Mental Health: State-of-the-Art Technical Review 2023The relationship between school climate and students' non-cognitive skills: A systematic literature review

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2016Can we use Google Scholar to identify highly-cited documents?article · 8 shared references 2017Google Scholar como una fuente de evaluación científica: una revisión bibliográfica sobre errores de la base de datosarticle · 8 shared references 2015Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the Webarticle · 7 shared references 2017An Evidence-Based Review of Academic Web Search Engines, 2014-2016: Implications for Librarians’ Practice and Research Agendaarticle · 7 shared references 2022Types of Errors Hiding in Google Scholar Dataarticle · 7 shared references 2016Un panorama académico de dos caras: retrato de los documentos altamente citados en Google Scholar (1950-2013)article · 7 shared references

Details

Year2019

Typechapter

Published2019-01-01

VenueSpringer handbooks

ISSN-L2522-8692

Languageen

Citations143

Files0 public / 0

Shelfscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Identifiers

doi10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_4

openalex_workW2807738452

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2021

Role of key performance indicators on agile transformation of performance management in research institutes towards innovative commercial agriculture

2022Charting future growth for Islamic finance talents in Malaysia: a bibliometric analysis on the Islamic finance domains and future research gaps

2023Mapping the use of Google Scholar in evaluative bibliometric or scientometric studies: A bibliometric review

2019Universities through the eyes of bibliographic databases: a retroactive growth comparison of Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science