SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Research misconduct: A grand global challenge for the 21st Century
9 references·1 citing·42 second hop
Research misconduct: A grand global challenge for the 21st Century (2013)Research misconduct: A grand global chall…Boldt: the great pretender (2013)Boldt: the great pretenderMeasuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Measuring the Prevalence of Q…A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)A Comprehensive Survey of Ret…The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity (2011)The Singapore Statement on Re…Singapore statement on research integrity (2011)Singapore statement on resear…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…ORI Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research (2004)ORI Introduction to the Respo…Publish, and be damned... (2002)Publish, and be damned...Impact factor bias and proposed adjustments for its determination (2002)Impact factor bias and propos…Responsible conduct of research: enhancing local opportunities (2017)Responsible conduct of resear…Journal Citation Reports (1986)Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved? (1996)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Citation analysis of the most influential authors and ophthalmology journals in the field of cataract and corneal refractive surgery 2000–2004 (2008)Comparison of Impact Factor, Eigenfactor Metrics, and SCImago Journal Rank Indicator and h-index for Neurosurgical and Spinal Surgical Journals (2018)Creativity in science and the link to cited references: Is the creative potential of papers reflected in their cited references? (2018)A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories (2008)Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign (2013)Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity (2015)What’s in a p? Reassessing best practices for conducting and reporting hypothesis-testing research (2017)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science (2012)Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology (2013)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct (1990)Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions (2006)Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study (1997)Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals (1998)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Faculty Mentoring Programs: Reenvisioning Rather Than Reinventing the Wheel (2008)Authorship and Responsibility in Health Sciences Research: A Review of Procedures for Fairly Allocating Authorship in Multi-Author Studies (2011)Scientific Misconduct (2015)Perpetuation of Retracted Publications Using the Example of the Scott S. Reuben Case: Incidences, Reasons and Possible Improvements (2015)Evidence for non‐random sampling in randomised, controlled trials by Yuhji Saitoh (2016)An analysis of retractions of papers authored by Scott Reuben, Joachim Boldt and Yoshitaka Fujii (2018)Transparency as an Instrumental Value (2006)Establishing a Systematic Six-Stage Process for Detecting Contract Cheating (2007)A content analysis of referees’ comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ? (2009)Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication (2016)Expert Trespassing Testimony and the Ethics of Science Communication (2018)Responsible Conduct of Research (2022)Heterogeneity in European Research Integrity Guidance (2014)THE EMERGING FIELD OF GEOETHICS (2017)Exploring the Gray Area: Similarities and Differences in Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) Across Main Areas of Research (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling2,240 cited
  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
  • 2012A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature355 cited
  • 2011The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity316 cited
  • 2004ORI Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research178 cited
  • 2013Boldt: the great pretender113 cited
  • 2002Impact factor bias and proposed adjustments for its determination77 cited
  • 2011Singapore statement on research integrity76 cited
  • 2002Publish, and be damned...55 cited

Cited by

  • 2017Responsible conduct of research: enhancing local opportunities14 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work