SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Interactive open access publishing and collaborative peer review for improved scientific communication and quality assurance
1 references·11 citing·38 second hop
Interactive open access publishing and collaborative peer review for improved scientific communication and quality assurance (2008)Interactive open access publishing and co…Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance (2004)Interactive journal concept f…Editorial challenges in a small scientific community: Study of Croatian editors (2018)Editorial challenges in a sma…Preserving the Quality of Scientific Research: Peer Review of Research Articles (2017)Preserving the Quality of Sci…Open Peer Review in Scientific Publishing: A Web Mining Study of PeerJ Authors and Reviewers (2016)Open Peer Review in Scientifi…Bibliometric analysis: global research trends in biogenic volatile organic compounds during 1991–2014 (2016)Bibliometric analysis: global…Scholarly Communication at the University of Namibia: Case study report (2014)Scholarly Communication at th…Learning from open source software projects to improve scientific review (2012)Learning from open source sof…Interactive open access publishing and public peer review: The effectiveness of transparency and self-regulation in scientific quality assurance (2010)Interactive open access publi…Interactive Open Access Publishing and Peer Review: The Effectiveness and Perspectives of Transparency and Self-Regulation in Scientific Communication and Evaluation (2010)Interactive Open Access Publi…Exploring a New Model for Preprint Server: A Case Study of CSPO (2010)Exploring a New Model for Pre…Interactive Open Access Peer Review: The Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Model (2009)Interactive Open Access Peer …Communicating chemistry (2009)Communicating chemistryCommunication: the Essence of Science (1979)Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication (2000)The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access (2004)Scholarly Electronic Publishing Bibliography 2010 (2011)search.bioPreprint: a discovery tool for cutting edge, preprint biomedical research articles (2016)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Aggregating post-publication peer reviews and ratings (2012)Evidence appraisal: a scoping review, conceptual framework, and research agenda (2017)Developing Open-Source Scientific Practice * (2018)Peer review in a rapidly evolving publishing landscape (2012)Ensuring effective scholarly communication: traditions and innovations of peer review (2021)Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (2024)Bias in peer review (2012)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)The state‐of‐the‐art of open peer review: Early adopters (2017)Peer review, bibliometrics and altmetrics ‐ Do we need them all? (2018)Open peer review correlates with altmetrics but not with citations: Evidence from Nature Communications and PLoS One (2024)Citation Indexing for Studying Science (1970)Bibliometric analysis of tsunami research (2007)Global stem cell research trend: Bibliometric analysis as a tool for mapping of trends from 1991 to 2006 (2009)80th Anniversary of Pure and Applied Geophysics: A Bibliometric Overview (2019)Measuring popularity of ecological topics in a temporal dynamical knowledge network (2019)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Editor home bias? (2023)A bit more to it: Scholarly Communication Forums as Socio‐Technical Interaction Networks (2002)Rethinking Scholarly Communication (2004)The Blue Obelisk—Interoperability in Chemical Informatics (2006)Has the Time Come for Preprints in Chemistry? (2017)The rise of preprints in chemistry (2020)From black box to white box at open access journals: predictive validity of manuscript reviewing and editorial decisions at Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (2010)Designing next-generation platforms for evaluating scientific output: what scientists can learn from the social web (2012)In public peer review of submitted manuscripts, how do reviewer comments differ from comments written by interested members of the scientific community? A content analysis of comments written for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (2012)The manuscript reviewing process: Empirical research on review requests, review sequences, and decision rules in peer review (2009)Closed versus open reviewing of journal manuscripts: how far do comments differ in language use? (2011)Big Data, data integrity, and the fracturing of the control zone (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2004Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance85 cited

Cited by

  • 2009Communicating chemistry29 cited
  • 2010Interactive open access publishing and public peer review: The effectiveness of transparency and self-regulation in scientific quality assurance28 cited
  • 2010Interactive Open Access Publishing and Peer Review: The Effectiveness and Perspectives of Transparency and Self-Regulation in Scientific Communication and Evaluation26 cited
  • 2012Learning from open source software projects to improve scientific review26 cited
  • 2016Bibliometric analysis: global research trends in biogenic volatile organic compounds during 1991–201421 cited
  • 2017Preserving the Quality of Scientific Research: Peer Review of Research Articles15 cited
  • 2016Open Peer Review in Scientific Publishing: A Web Mining Study of PeerJ Authors and Reviewers15 cited
  • 2010Exploring a New Model for Preprint Server: A Case Study of CSPO13 cited
  • 2009Interactive Open Access Peer Review: The Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Model10 cited
  • 2018Editorial challenges in a small scientific community: Study of Croatian editors10 cited
  • 2014Scholarly Communication at the University of Namibia: Case study report7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work