References

• 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
• 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias7,306 cited
• 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials4,099 cited
• 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
• 2003Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group2,184 cited
• 1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
• 2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
• 1999Assessing the Quality of Randomized Trials649 cited
• 2003The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials260 cited
• 2005Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors178 cited
• 2005Adequacy and reporting of allocation concealment: review of recent trials published in four general medical journals176 cited
• 2008An assessment of the quality of randomised controlled trials conducted in China75 cited
• 2008Chinese authors do need CONSORT: Reporting quality assessment for five leading Chinese medical journals66 cited
• 2009Quality of Reports on Randomized Controlled Trials Conducted in Japan: Evaluation of Adherence to the CONSORT Statement