Responsible management education for a sustainable world

2015-01-22articleJournal of Management Development202 citationsclosed

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Sustainability in Higher Education Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Management and Marketing Education

Abstract

Purpose – The reforms in business schools based on the Ford and Carnegie Foundation reports (Pierson, 1959; Gordon and Howell, 1959) have been very successful in embedding management in a research-based body of knowledge, thereby elevating the academic status of business administration. These reforms, however, did nothing toward making management more socially trustworthy or management education more responsible. In the light of the pressing economic, social and environmental crises the world is facing, the feeling is spreading that not only business and economics but business schools also need to change fundamentally, if they want to be a provider of solutions to these crises and thereby keep and regain their legitimacy. The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical analysis of the fundamental challenges facing the role of business schools and their contributions in the areas of education, research, managing faculty, and role of the business school. It presents suggestions what responsible management education for a sustainable world could and should look like. Design/methodology/approach – The paper builds on the existing literature on the needed changes in business schools and has been written as part of a large international project, the 50+20 initiative ( www.50plus20.org ), which was developed by a broad coalition of organizations with the World Business School Council for Sustainable Business (WBSCSB), the Globally Responsible Leadership Initiative (GRLI) and the UN Principles for Responsible Management Education (PRME) at its core and 16 business schools and organizations from all around the world as supporters (Muffet al., 2013). Findings – Business schools need to transform themselves fundamentally, if they want to be a provider of solutions to the crises of responsibility and sustainability and thereby keep and regain their legitimacy. Originality/value – The paper pulls together insights from a diverse area of literature and develops practical conclusions.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 202 citations exist upstream.

References

2005Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Enhancing Experiential Learning in Higher Education

2005Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices

1994The New Production of Knowledge

2007Engaged Scholarship

2002The End of Business Schools? Less Success Than Meets the Eye

2006Knowledge for Theory and Practice

2005How Business Schools Lost Their Way

2004Managers, not MBA's: a hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development

Cited by

2016Business School Legitimacy and the Challenge of Sustainability: A Fuzzy Set Analysis of Institutional Decoupling

2018The power of art to foster systems thinking, one of the key competencies of education for sustainable development

2019Gender Equality and UN Sustainable Development Goals: Priorities and Correlations in the Top Business Schools’ Communication and Legitimation Strategies

2019Inspiring organizational commitment

2016Applying the Kirkpatrick model: Evaluating an Interaction for Learning Framework curriculum intervention

2021Decoupling responsible management education: Do business schools walk their talk?

2020