References

• 2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
• 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
• 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
• 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
• 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials3,824 cited
• 1998meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies1,370 cited
• 2001Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies919 cited
• 2002Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study891 cited
• 1998The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials769 cited
• 1996Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews538 cited
• 2002Correlation of Quality Measures With Estimates of Treatment Effect in Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials473 cited
• 2000What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses?454 cited
• 2009Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized?231 cited
• 2001