SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register: Electronic Searching and Beyond
16 references·0 citing·43 second hop
The Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register: Electronic Searching and Beyond (2003)The Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Reg…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2003)The CONSORT statement: revise…How to … find the evidence (2003)How to … find the evidenceFull publication of trials initially reported as abstracts in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine 1980−2000 (2003)Full publication of trials in…Nearly half of dental randomized controlled trials published in German are not included in Medline (2002)Nearly half of dental randomi…Fate of abstracts presented at five International Conferences on Pharmacoepidemiology (ICPE): 1995–1999 (2002)Fate of abstracts presented a…Benchmarking the dental randomised controlled literature on MEDLINE (2002)Benchmarking the dental rando…Benchmarking the clinical prosthetic dental literature on MEDLINE (2002)Benchmarking the clinical pro…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Publication Rate of Abstracts Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery (2001)Publication Rate of Abstracts…Publication Rates of Abstracts from Two Pharmacy Meetings (2000)Publication Rates of Abstract…Publication of Abstracts Submitted to the Annual Meeting of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (2000)Publication of Abstracts Subm…Identifying Clinical Trials in the Medical Literature with Electronic Databases (2000)Identifying Clinical Trials i…meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies (1998)meta-analysis bias in locatio…Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German (1997)Language bias in randomised c…Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Identifyi…The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)The Existence of Publication …Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement (2004)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Fate of Cardiology Research Originally Published in Abstract Form (1980)Full Publication of Results Initially Presented in Abstracts (1994)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis (1994)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2005)Fate of the abstracts presented at three Spanish clinical pharmacology congresses and reasons for unpublished research (2007)Publication rate of abstracts presented at the Canadian society of otolaryngology- head and neck surgery annual meetings: A five year study 2006–2010 (2014)The fate of abstracts submitted to a cancer meeting: Factors which influence presentation and subsequent publication (1992)Unpublished Research From a Medical Specialty Meeting (1998)Publication bias in gastroenterological research – a retrospective cohort study based on abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting (2002)Factors influencing publication of abstracts presented at the AAO‐HNS Annual Meeting (2006)Publication Rate of Abstracts Presented at the Shoulder and Elbow Session of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery (2008)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed (2005)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011)Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting (1998)Accuracy of Data in Abstracts of Published Research Articles (1999)Abstract to publication ratio for papers presented at scientific meetings: How does emergency medicine compare? (2001)Conversion of Cardiovascular Conference Abstracts to Publications (2012)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Obstacles and opportunities in meta-analysis of genetic association studies (2005)The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) (2005)Quality Criteria for Serious Games: Serious Part, Game Part, and Balance (2020)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Cochrane Collaboration Handbook (1996)HTA 101 INTRODUCTION TO HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (2004)Effects of Exercise Interventions on Body Image (2009)Network meta-analyses could be improved by searching more sources and by involving a librarian (2014)Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences (2000)A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta‐analysis (2001)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials2,754 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews2,256 cited
  • 1990The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence1,413 cited
  • 1998meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies1,370 cited
  • 1997Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German1,029 cited
  • 2003The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials258 cited
  • 2000Identifying Clinical Trials in the Medical Literature with Electronic Databases181 cited
  • 2000Publication of Abstracts Submitted to the Annual Meeting of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America73 cited
  • 2000Publication Rates of Abstracts from Two Pharmacy Meetings64 cited
  • 2001Publication Rate of Abstracts Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery34 cited
  • 2002Nearly half of dental randomized controlled trials published in German are not included in Medline33 cited
  • 2002Fate of abstracts presented at five International Conferences on Pharmacoepidemiology (ICPE): 1995–199926 cited
  • 2003How to … find the evidence24 cited
  • 2002Benchmarking the clinical prosthetic dental literature on MEDLINE

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

23 cited
  • 2002Benchmarking the dental randomised controlled literature on MEDLINE20 cited
  • 2003Full publication of trials initially reported as abstracts in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine 1980−200018 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.