A configurational theory of control

Laura B. Cardinal · Sim B. Sitkin · Chris P. Long

122 citations0/0 files storedCambridge University Press eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Accounting and Organizational Management Management Theory and Practice Management and Organizational Studies

Abstract

Organization theory scholars have long acknowledged that control processes are integral to the way in which organizations function (Blau and Scott,1962; Etzioni, 1965; Tannenbaum, 1962). While control theory research spans many decades and draws on several rich traditions (Dunbar and Statler, Chapter 2), several theoretical problems have kept it from generating reasonably consistent and interpretable empirical findings and from reaching consensus concerning the nature of key relationships. As new forms of organizational relations (networks, alliances, mass customization, supply chains, consortia, contract employees, telecommuting, virtual teams, etc.) emerged in the late twentieth century, traditional organizational control theories were viewed as less and less relevant by organizational scholars. As a result, attention to organizational control research waned, with the exception of critical theorists (e.g., Adler, 2007; Tsoukas, 2007) and accounting researchers (e.g., Davilia and Foster, 2007; Whitley, 1999). For example, despite the importance of the topic and the pervasiveness of the control phenomenon in organizations, organizational control research has not been sufficiently cumulative. The control literature is rich, but deceptive. Although most organizational scholars might be shocked by our assertion, we observe that there is very little empirical work on control in the organizational literature relative to other classic and fundamental organizational phenomena (e.g., design-effectiveness, planning-performance, diversification–performance relationships). From a distance, it may appear as though there is a great deal of empirical work and that there is broad support for the few dominant control theories (e.g., Merchant, 1985; Ouchi 1977, 1979).

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 122 citations exist upstream.

References

1976Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications.1999Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data 1912The Principles of Scientific Management.2015Principles of Scientific Management, The 1980Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans 1989The Structuring of Organizations 1995Explaining Development and Change in Organizations 1979A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms

Cited by

2011Fairness Monitoring: Linking Managerial Controls and Fairness Judgments in Organizations 2016The Architecture of Dynamic Capability Research Identifying the Building Blocks of a Configurational Approach 2018Organizational Controls and Performance Outcomes: A Meta‐Analytic Assessment and Extension 2014Organizational control as antidote to politics in the pursuit of strategic initiatives 2015Knowledge transfer from international joint ventures to local suppliers in a developing economy 2014

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.