SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Juror Discussions During Civil Trials: Studying an Arizona Innovation
0 references·15 citing·54 second hop
Juror Discussions During Civil Trials: Studying an Arizona Innovation (2003)Juror Discussions During Civil Trials: St…The Philosophy of Legal Proof (2024)The Philosophy of Legal ProofIndividual versus group decision making: Jurors’ reliance on central and peripheral information to evaluate expert testimony (2017)Individual versus group decis…Social Psychology and the Law (2016)Social Psychology and the LawEvidentiary, extraevidentiary, and deliberation process predictors of real jury verdicts. (2016)Evidentiary, extraevidentiary…Jurors Report that Risk Measure Scores Matter in Sexually Violent Predator Trials, but that Other Factors Matter More (2015)Jurors Report that Risk Measu…Rational inattention and revealed preference: The data-theoretic approach to economic modeling (2013)Rational inattention and reve…Developing and Assessing Intercoder Reliability in Studies of Group Interaction (2012)Developing and Assessing Inte…Empirical Legal Scholarship in Law Reviews (2010)Empirical Legal Scholarship i…Stories from the jury room: How jurors use narrative to process evidence (2009)Stories from the jury room: H…Goffman on the jury: Real jurors’ attention to the “offstage” of trials. (2009)Goffman on the jury: Real jur…Determinants and Consequences of Jury Racial Diversity: Empirical Findings, Implications, and Directions for Future Research (2008)Determinants and Consequences…Do Juries Deliberate? A Study of Deliberation, Individual Difference, and Group Member Satisfaction at a Municipal Courthouse (2007)Do Juries Deliberate? A Study…Deliberation Quality: A Preliminary Examination in Criminal Juries (2007)Deliberation Quality: A Preli…Expert Evidence, the Adversary System, and the Jury (2005)Expert Evidence, the Adversar…Psychological Evidence at the Dawn of the Law's Scientific Age (2004)Psychological Evidence at the…The American Jury (1971)The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process (1987)Inside the Judicial Mind (2001)Scientific Evidence and Public Policy (2005)Prosecuting from the bench? Examining sources of pro‐prosecution bias in judges (2022)Sortition as Anti‐Corruption: Popular Oversight against Elite Capture (2022)The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion (1986)The Constitution of Society. (1988)Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method (2007)Getting to (not) guilty: examining jurors' deliberative processes in, and beyond, the context of a mock rape trial (2010)Twelve (not so) angry men (2011)Envisioning the Role of Facilitation in Public Deliberation (2013)Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. (1973)Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (2000)Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. (2001)Can we trust intuitive jurors? An experimental analysis (2008)Representation through Participation: A Multilevel Analysis of Jury Deliberations (2011)Capital-izing Jurors: How Death Qualification Relates to Jury Composition, Jurors’ Perceptions, and Trial Outcomes (2016)Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. (1995)Why People Obey the Law (2006)Handbook of Social Psychology (2013)The role of rational choice in explaining electricity consumption and jury composition (2013)Can Explicit Instructions Reduce Expressions of Implicit Bias? New Questions Following a Test of a Specialized Jury Instruction (2014)Racially diverse juries promote self-monitoring efforts during jury deliberation. (2017)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. (1984)Adaptive Planning for Disaster Recovery and Resiliency: An Evaluation of 87 Local Recovery Plans in Eight States (2014)Precarious Sexuality: How Men and Women Are Differentially Categorized for Similar Sexual Behavior (2018)Collective Social Identity: Synthesizing Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory Using Digital Data (2019)Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2019)The Path of the Law (1897)The Problem of Social Cost (1960)Empirical Legal Research: The Gap between Facts and Values and Legal Academic Training (2015)Field Research on Law in Conflict Zones and Authoritarian States (2016)Empirical Legal Research in Europe: Prevalence, Obstacles, and Interventions (2018)Evaluating Competencies: Forensic Assessments and Instruments (1988)Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment (1998)Modern scientific evidence : the law and science of expert testimony (2006)Implicit Bias and Accountability Systems: What Must Organizations Do to Prevent Discrimination? (2009)The Research-Practice Gap in I/O Psychology and Related Fields: Challenges and Potential Solutions (2012)On the general acceptance of confessions research: Opinions of the scientific community. (2018)Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional DYnamics of Organizational Groups (1998)On racial diversity and group decision making: Identifying multiple effects of racial composition on jury deliberations. (2006)Evaluating witness testimony: Juror knowledge, false memory, and the utility of evidence-based directions (2021)The subtle effects of implicit bias instructions (2022)Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. (1980)The need for cognition. (1982)Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? (2000)Exploring juror evaluations of expert opinions using the Expert Persuasion Expectancy framework (2020)How expert witnesses' counterfactuals influence causal and responsibility attributions of mock jurors and expert judges (2020)Likeability and Expert Persuasion: Dislikeability Reduces the Perceived Persuasiveness of Expert Evidence (2021)Knowledge and Its Limits (2000)Considerations on Representative Government (2010)Introduction to English Legal History (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2012Developing and Assessing Intercoder Reliability in Studies of Group Interaction53 cited
  • 2007Do Juries Deliberate? A Study of Deliberation, Individual Difference, and Group Member Satisfaction at a Municipal Courthouse50 cited
  • 2004Psychological Evidence at the Dawn of the Law's Scientific Age49 cited
  • 2010Empirical Legal Scholarship in Law Reviews47 cited
  • 2005Expert Evidence, the Adversary System, and the Jury43 cited
  • 2007Deliberation Quality: A Preliminary Examination in Criminal Juries39 cited
  • 2008Determinants and Consequences of Jury Racial Diversity: Empirical Findings, Implications, and Directions for Future Research27 cited
  • 2017Individual versus group decision making: Jurors’ reliance on central and peripheral information to evaluate expert testimony26 cited
  • 2024The Philosophy of Legal Proof21 cited
  • 2016Evidentiary, extraevidentiary, and deliberation process predictors of real jury verdicts.20 cited
  • 2009Goffman on the jury: Real jurors’ attention to the “offstage” of trials.19 cited
  • 2015Jurors Report that Risk Measure Scores Matter in Sexually Violent Predator Trials, but that Other Factors Matter More18 cited
  • 2009Stories from the jury room: How jurors use narrative to process evidence18 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2016
Social Psychology and the Law
3 cited
  • 2013Rational inattention and revealed preference: The data-theoretic approach to economic modeling2 cited