Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Balancing benefits and harms in health care

3 references·8 citing·40 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials2,754 cited
2001Incomplete evidence: the inadequacy of databases in tracing published adverse drug reactions in clinical trials110 cited

Cited by

2004How to spot bias and other potential problems in randomised controlled trials78 cited
2006Room for improvement? A survey of the methods used in systematic reviews of adverse effects73 cited
2004Assessing harmful effects in systematic Reviews69 cited
2009Systematic reviews of adverse effects of drug interventions: a survey of their conduct and reporting quality54 cited
2016The reporting of adverse events following spinal manipulation in randomized clinical trials—a systematic review44 cited
2008Assessment of adverse effects and applicability – two areas not (yet) covered adequately in Cochrane reports19 cited
2022Inadequate Reporting of Complications in Randomized Controlled Trials Cited as Supporting Evidence Underpinning AAOS CPG Recommendations for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: Application of the CONSORT Harms Checklist17 cited
2022Harms-related data are poorly reported among randomized controlled trials underpinning the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline recommendations for rotator cuff injuries12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work