SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results · Study

ReviewReporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results

Sally Hopewell2008

Review2008

Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results

Sally Hopewell · Luke Wolfenden · Mike J Clarke

64 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 64 citations exist upstream.

References

2005The Cochrane Library 2004Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement 2001Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: an evaluation of 7 medical areas.2006Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies 2005Challenges in Systematic Reviews That Assess Treatment Harms 2001Reporting of adverse drug reactions in randomised controlled trials – a systematic survey 2001Incomplete evidence: the inadequacy of databases in tracing published adverse drug reactions in clinical trials 2001Assessment of therapeutic safety in systematic reviews: literature review

Cited by

2021Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 1: An introduction to research on harms 2014Comparison of search strategies in systematic reviews of adverse effects to other systematic reviews 2009Systematic reviews of adverse effects of drug interventions: a survey of their conduct and reporting quality 2009Reporting of adverse events in randomized controlled trials of highly active antiretroviral therapy: systematic review

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2009Systematic reviews of adverse effects of drug interventions: a survey of their conduct and reporting qualityreview · 6 shared references 2008Assessment of adverse effects and applicability – two areas not (yet) covered adequately in Cochrane reportsarticle · 6 shared references 2006Methodological shortcomings predicted lower harm estimates in one of two sets of studies of clinical interventionsreview · 5 shared references 2012Failure or success of electronic search strategies to identify adverse effects dataarticle · 5 shared references 2008Assessing Harms When Comparing Medical Interventionsarticle · 5 shared references 2004Assessing harmful effects in systematic Reviewsreview · 4 shared references

Details

Year2008

Typereview

Published2008-04-15

VenueJournal of Clinical Epidemiology

ISSN-L0895-4356

Languageen

Citations64

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.005

openalex_workW2070004161

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2018

More than one-third of systematic reviews did not fully report the adverse events outcome

2013Some improvements are apparent in identifying adverse effects in systematic reviews from 1994 to 2011

2021Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 2: Methods used to assess harms are neglected in systematic reviews of gabapentin

2014Side effects are incompletely reported among systematic reviews in gastroenterology