SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results
11 references·13 citing·47 second hop
Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results (2008)Reporting of adverse events in systematic…Room for improvement? A survey of the methods used in systematic reviews of adverse effects (2006)Room for improvement? A surve…Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies (2006)Comparison of evidence on har…The Cochrane Library (2005)The Cochrane LibraryChallenges in Systematic Reviews That Assess Treatment Harms (2005)Challenges in Systematic Revi…Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)Better Reporting of Harms in …Availability of large-scale evidence on specific harms from systematic reviews of randomized trials (2004)Availability of large-scale e…Assessing harmful effects in systematic Reviews (2004)Assessing harmful effects in …Reporting of adverse drug reactions in randomised controlled trials – a systematic survey (2001)Reporting of adverse drug rea…Incomplete evidence: the inadequacy of databases in tracing published adverse drug reactions in clinical trials (2001)Incomplete evidence: the inad…Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: an evaluation of 7 medical areas. (2001)Completeness of safety report…Assessment of therapeutic safety in systematic reviews: literature review (2001)Assessment of therapeutic saf…Conducting separate reviews of benefits and harms could improve systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2023)Conducting separate reviews o…Registration and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews on Surgical Intervention: A Meta-epidemiological Study (2022)Registration and Reporting Qu…Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 2: Methods used to assess harms are neglected in systematic reviews of gabapentin (2021)Harms in Systematic Reviews P…Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 1: An introduction to research on harms (2021)Harms in Systematic Reviews P…Seeking adverse effects in systematic reviews of orthodontic interventions: protocol for a cross-sectional study (2019)Seeking adverse effects in sy…More than one-third of systematic reviews did not fully report the adverse events outcome (2018)More than one-third of system…Side effects are incompletely reported among systematic reviews in gastroenterology (2014)Side effects are incompletely…La Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología (RCA) acoge la Declaración de transparencia y lineamientos para publicación de artículos, entre ellos CARE, para reporte de caso (2014)La Revista Colombiana de Anes…Comparison of search strategies in systematic reviews of adverse effects to other systematic reviews (2014)Comparison of search strategi…Some improvements are apparent in identifying adverse effects in systematic reviews from 1994 to 2011 (2013)Some improvements are apparen…Pitfalls in meta‐analyses on adverse events reported from clinical trials (2011)Pitfalls in meta‐analyses on …Systematic reviews of adverse effects of drug interventions: a survey of their conduct and reporting quality (2009)Systematic reviews of adverse…Reporting of adverse events in randomized controlled trials of highly active antiretroviral therapy: systematic review (2009)Reporting of adverse events i…Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Value of “Traditional” Reviews in the Era of Systematic Reviewing (2009)A review of safety, side-effects and subjective reactions to intranasal oxytocin in human research (2011)Reporting of harms data in RCTs: a systematic review of empirical assessments against the CONSORT harms extension (2013)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews (2008)Reporting of Adverse Effects in Clinical Trials Should Be Improved (1999)Balancing benefits and harms in health care (2003)Safety Reporting in Randomized Trials of Mental Health Interventions (2004)Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects (2008)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Therapeutic Devices and Procedures (2005)Cannabis in the management of PTSD: a systematic review (2021)Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (1998)Quality of Complication Reporting in the Surgical Literature (2002)Perfect Study, Poor Evidence: Interpretation of Biases Preceding Study Design (2008)Reporting of Harm in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Urological Literature (2010)Comprehensive evaluations of the adverse effects of drugs: importance of appropriate study selection and data sources (2011)Reporting results of cancer treatment (1981)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement (2007)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction (1992)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Meta-Analysis, Decision Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (1999)Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review (2010)PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews (2016)Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions (2017)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Not only randomized controlled trials, but also case series should be considered in systematic reviews of rapidly developing technologies (2009)Basic study design influences the results of orthodontic clinical investigations (2015)Suicidality and aggression during antidepressant treatment: systematic review and meta-analyses based on clinical study reports (2016)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Declaración de la iniciativa STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology): directrices para la comunicación de estudios observacionales (2008)The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016: Explanation and elaboration. (2016)Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results (2005)Understanding participation in sport and physical activity among children and adults: a review of qualitative studies (2006)Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses (2008)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005The Cochrane Library2,035 cited
  • 2004Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement1,588 cited
  • 2001Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: an evaluation of 7 medical areas.564 cited
  • 2006Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies228 cited
  • 2005Challenges in Systematic Reviews That Assess Treatment Harms147 cited
  • 2001Reporting of adverse drug reactions in randomised controlled trials – a systematic survey128 cited
  • 2001Incomplete evidence: the inadequacy of databases in tracing published adverse drug reactions in clinical trials110 cited
  • 2001Assessment of therapeutic safety in systematic reviews: literature review94 cited
  • 2004Availability of large-scale evidence on specific harms from systematic reviews of randomized trials79 cited
  • 2006Room for improvement? A survey of the methods used in systematic reviews of adverse effects73 cited
  • 2004Assessing harmful effects in systematic Reviews69 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 1: An introduction to research on harms62 cited
  • 2014Comparison of search strategies in systematic reviews of adverse effects to other systematic reviews55 cited
  • 2009Systematic reviews of adverse effects of drug interventions: a survey of their conduct and reporting quality

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

54 cited
  • 2009Reporting of adverse events in randomized controlled trials of highly active antiretroviral therapy: systematic review53 cited
  • 2018More than one-third of systematic reviews did not fully report the adverse events outcome39 cited
  • 2021Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 2: Methods used to assess harms are neglected in systematic reviews of gabapentin34 cited
  • 2013Some improvements are apparent in identifying adverse effects in systematic reviews from 1994 to 201134 cited
  • 2014Side effects are incompletely reported among systematic reviews in gastroenterology26 cited
  • 2011Pitfalls in meta‐analyses on adverse events reported from clinical trials26 cited
  • 2022Registration and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews on Surgical Intervention: A Meta-epidemiological Study12 cited
  • 2019Seeking adverse effects in systematic reviews of orthodontic interventions: protocol for a cross-sectional study11 cited
  • 2023Conducting separate reviews of benefits and harms could improve systematic reviews and meta-analyses11 cited
  • 2014La Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología (RCA) acoge la Declaración de transparencia y lineamientos para publicación de artículos, entre ellos CARE, para reporte de caso9 cited