No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Abstract In contrast to political and social science writing geographers have been ambivalent about the efficacy of studying mayors in order to advance urban theory. Geographers’ engaged in studying urban governance have generally disavowed the relevance of theoretical and empirical engagement with specific actors and institutions in their consideration of space, scale and state strategy. Here I show that current theoretical developments nonetheless signpost the possibilities of a shift from an ambivalent view of mayor as ‘actor’, to a situation where consideration of mayor as ‘avatar’ offers useful ways of contributing to understanding of the abstract and complex spatialities of territorial and relational urban worlds.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 7 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.