Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Methodology and reporting of meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature

16 references·16 citing·31 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement19,577 cited
2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration17,627 cited
2021Introduction to Meta‐Analysis9,785 cited
1976Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research4,889 cited
1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
2000Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context2,307 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2000Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research1,795 cited

2009AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews1,756 cited

1987Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials1,253 cited

Cited by

2017Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on psoriasis: role of funding sources, conflict of interest and bibliometric indices as predictors of methodological quality39 cited
2018Reporting Quality of Systematic Review Abstracts Published in Leading Neurosurgical Journals: A Research on Research Study38 cited
2016An assessment of the compliance of systematic review articles published in craniofacial surgery with the PRISMA statement guidelines: A systematic review37 cited
2017Compliance of systematic reviews articles in brain arteriovenous malformation with PRISMA statement guidelines: Review of literature33 cited
2015Methodological quality assessment of paper-based systematic reviews published in oral health30 cited
2016Longitudinal analysis of reporting and quality of systematic reviews in high-impact surgical journals25 cited
2020Critically Low Confidence in the Results Produced by Spine Surgery Systematic Reviews: An AMSTAR-2 Evaluation From 4 Spine Journals25 cited
2024Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in neurosurgery Part II: a guide to designing the protocol24 cited
2024Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in neurosurgery part I: interpreting and critically appraising as a guide for clinical practice21 cited
2016Is the Best Evidence Good Enough: Quality Assessment and Factor Analysis of Meta-Analyses on Depression19 cited
2020Pearls for Interpreting Neurosurgical Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: Lessons From a Collaborative Effort18 cited
2015Strategies to improve the credibility of meta-analyses in spine surgery: a systematic survey18 cited
2022Systematic Analysis of Publication Bias in Neurosurgery Meta-Analyses16 cited
2014The Role of Neurosurgery Journals in Evidence-Based Neurosurgical Care14 cited
2016Raising the standard of systematic reviews published in Environment International14 cited
2019Reporting trends of p values in the neurosurgical literature13 cited