Can the Subaltern Speak?
Abstract
Gayatri Spivak’s essay “Can the Subaltern Speak?” has influenced the ways feminists think of postcoloniality, state representation, and global capitalism. In asking the question, “Can the subaltern speak?” Spivak critiques French poststructuralist thought, notably Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze, while also expanding the Marxist focus on workers’ struggle. In doing so, Spivak discusses how the silence of postcolonial women is maintained through structures of power embedded in the state, capitalism, and the academy. Rather than being heard, postcolonial women are articulated as the object of colonialism’s savior complex. Spivak writes about this set of relations and encounters as racialized, noting that colonialism structures thinking such that it can appear as if “White men are saving brown women from brown men.” Here, women’s imagined place is as objects and subjects of violence. Their own testimony is elided, rendering them incapable of speaking or being heard.
Cite this
Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak (2003). Can the Subaltern Speak?. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003341567-11
@article{chakravorty2003can,
title = {Can the Subaltern Speak?},
author = {Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty},
year = {2003},
journal = {Routledge eBooks},
doi = {10.4324/9781003341567-11}
}Citations in this library
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 4,166 citations exist upstream.