SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Assessing the Quality of Reports of Systematic Reviews: The QUOROM Statement Compared to Other Tools
16 references·16 citing·35 second hopsampled
Assessing the Quality of Reports of Systematic Reviews: The QUOROM Statement Compared to Other Tools (2001)Assessing the Quality of Reports of Syste…Health Measurement Scales--A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (2010)Health Measurement Scales--A …Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Does quality of reports of ra…Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires (1997)Measuring Health: A Guide to …Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German (1997)Language bias in randomised c…Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study (1997)Impact of covert duplicate pu…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)The Handbook of Research Synt…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasSystematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Identifyi…Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated (1994)Systematic Review: Why source…The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)The Medical Review Article: S…Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Res…Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Meta-Analyses of Randomized C…Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. (1986)Publication bias: the case fo…Search and Selection Procedures of Literature Reviews in Behavior Analysis (2020)Search and Selection Procedur…Primary Study Quality in Psychological Meta-Analyses: An Empirical Assessment of Recent Practice (2019)Primary Study Quality in Psyc…Evaluating Article Search and Selection Procedures in Special Education Literature Reviews (2018)Evaluating Article Search and…Quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in pediatric surgery (2017)Quality of systematic reviews…Cognitive remediation in schizophrenia: A methodological appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2016)Cognitive remediation in schi…Reporting quality of search methods in systematic reviews of HIV behavioral interventions (2000-2010): are the searches clearly explained, systematic and reproducible? (2013)Reporting quality of search m…Inquisitio validus Index Medicus: A simple method of validating MEDLINE systematic review searches (2011)Inquisitio validus Index Medi…An analysis of quality of systematic reviews on pharmacist health interventions (2011)An analysis of quality of sys…What is meta-analysis? (2009)What is meta-analysis?Quality of systematic reviews in pediatric oncology – A systematic review (2009)Quality of systematic reviews…Poor reporting of search strategy and conflict of interest in over 250 narrative and systematic reviews of two biologic agents in arthritis: A systematic review (2008)Poor reporting of search stra…No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews (2008)No consensus exists on search…The quality of systematic reviews of effectiveness in literacy learning in English: a ‘tertiary’ review (2006)The quality of systematic rev…Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews? (2006)Does updating improve the met…Survey of systematic reviews in dentistry (2004)Survey of systematic reviews …Reviewing measures of outcome: reliability of data extraction (2004)Reviewing measures of outcome…Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis (1994)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed (2005)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences (2000)THE FILE-DRAWER PROBLEM REVISITED: A GENERAL WEIGHTED METHOD FOR CALCULATING FAIL-SAFE NUMBERS IN META-ANALYSIS (2005)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes (2010)The PHQ-9 (2001)Does positive affect influence health? (2005)The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content (2010)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 1995The Handbook of Research Synthesis.3,643 cited
  • 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews2,256 cited
  • 2010Health Measurement Scales--A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use1,870 cited
  • 1997Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires1,526 cited
  • 1987Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research1,267 cited
  • 1987Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials1,253 cited
  • 1997Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German1,029 cited
  • 1994Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated1,016 cited
  • 1987The Medical Review Article: State of the Science857 cited
  • 1986Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

746 cited
  • 1997Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study699 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2009Quality of systematic reviews in pediatric oncology – A systematic review78 cited
    • 2009What is meta-analysis?78 cited
    • 2004Survey of systematic reviews in dentistry71 cited
    • 2011An analysis of quality of systematic reviews on pharmacist health interventions67 cited
    • 2008No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews63 cited
    • 2006The quality of systematic reviews of effectiveness in literacy learning in English: a ‘tertiary’ review59 cited
    • 2006Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?49 cited
    • 2013Reporting quality of search methods in systematic reviews of HIV behavioral interventions (2000-2010): are the searches clearly explained, systematic and reproducible?39 cited
    • 2018Evaluating Article Search and Selection Procedures in Special Education Literature Reviews39 cited
    • 2008Poor reporting of search strategy and conflict of interest in over 250 narrative and systematic reviews of two biologic agents in arthritis: A systematic review38 cited
    • 2016Cognitive remediation in schizophrenia: A methodological appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses37 cited
    • 2019Primary Study Quality in Psychological Meta-Analyses: An Empirical Assessment of Recent Practice28 cited
    • 2020Search and Selection Procedures of Literature Reviews in Behavior Analysis24 cited
    • 2011Inquisitio validus Index Medicus: A simple method of validating MEDLINE systematic review searches22 cited
    • 2004Reviewing measures of outcome: reliability of data extraction22 cited
    • 2017Quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in pediatric surgery14 cited