Responses to Lavoie, King, and Dow on What Is Post Keynesianism and Who Is a Post Keynesian

Abstract

Lavoie, King, and Dow share one common theme in their criticism of my review of King’s (2001) book A History of Post Keynesian Economics . They all object, in different ways and in different degrees to (1) my definition of the boundary lines that encompass Post Keynesian economics and (2) who, in the 21st century, should be entitled to be labeled a Post Keynesian. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 29 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.