Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Techniques for Monitoring the Comparability of Examination Standards

2 references·13 citing·41 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1957Objective Tests as Instruments of Psychological Theory1,474 cited
2006Standard Setting: A Guide to Establishing and Evaluating Performance Standards on Tests316 cited

Cited by

2013Peer assessment without assessment criteria131 cited
2011Comparative judgement for assessment119 cited
2019A meta-analysis on the reliability of comparative judgement82 cited
2015The problem of assessing problem solving: can comparative judgement help?67 cited
2016Validity of comparative judgement to assess academic writing: examining implications of its holistic character and building on a shared consensus66 cited
2017Scale Separation Reliability: What Does It Mean in the Context of Comparative Judgment?60 cited
2008Relative difficulty of examinations in different subjects60 cited
2008Comparability of GCSE examinations in different subjects: an application of the Rasch model56 cited
2014ITC Guidelines on Quality Control in Scoring, Test Analysis, and Reporting of Test Scores54 cited
2018The effect of adaptivity on the reliability coefficient in adaptive comparative judgement48 cited
2016Using comparative judgement and online technologies in the assessment and measurement of creative performance and capability40 cited
2016Language effects in international testing: the case of PISA 2006 science items

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

39 cited

2009The dearth of managerialism in implementation of national examinations policy21 cited