No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
This paper provides a comparative analysis of the East Asian and Mexican crises, and draws lessons for the emerging economies.Although much of the discussion concentrates on East Asia and Mexico, I also draw on the history of some previous crisis episodes.I argue that in spite of the efforts to understand the anatomy of currency crises, there are still a large number of controversial and unresolved issues.More to the point, I argue that some of the lessons extracted from these crises are based on a misreading of the historical record.As a result, some of the policy implications that have emerged from this debate are, to say the least, questionable.In particular, I make two points: First, I argue that, in general, current account ratios have limited usefulness in determining a country's financial health.Although I fall short of taking the position that the current account is completely irrelevant, I do argue that a rigid interpretation of current account ratios may be highly misleading.Second, I argue that the rapidly growing popularity of controls on capital inflows as a device for reducing external vulnerability is rooted in a misreading of the recent history of external crises.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 85 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.