A Meta‐Analytic Multitrait Multirater Separation of Substance and Style in Social Desirability Scales

Brian S. Connelly · Luye Chang

62 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Personality

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Personality Traits and Psychology Psychological Testing and Assessment

Abstract

Though unlikely virtues scales have a long history in personality, clinical, and applied psychology for detecting socially desirable responding, using such social desirability (SD) scales has generally failed to improve the validity of personality measures. We examined whether this is because (a) response distortion itself has minimal impact on personality's validity, (b) SD scales are ineffective at assessing response distortion, or (c) SD scales are conflated with substantive trait variance. We compiled a meta-analytic multitrait multimethod matrix consisting of multirater personality traits, SD scales, and performance outcomes. We examined the influence of trait factors and self-report method factors on SD scales and performance. We found that self-report method variance (a) was negatively related to performance, (b) would suppress personality-performance relationships for self-report measures, and (c) was (partially) assessed by SD scales. However, relative to the effects of self-report method variance, SD scales are even more strongly influenced by Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, and Agreeableness. It is not the case that SD scales are insensitive to inflated responding but that their susceptibility to personality trait variance likely outweighs their benefits. We discuss the implications of these results for using SD scales in research and practice.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 62 citations exist upstream.

References

2003Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.1960A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.1990Personality Structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model 1991Measurement and Control of Response Bias 2004Methods of Meta-Analysis 1984Two-component models of socially desirable responding.2009A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance.2001Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next?

Cited by

2016The General Factor of Personality (GFP) as social effectiveness: Review of the literature 2017Cognitive‐Adaptive Trait Theory: A Shift in Perspective on Personality 2023Impression management in daily life: an experience sampling test for the expression of impression management as interpersonally oriented self-control

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.