SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Editorial peer review : its strengths and weaknesses
0 references·16 citing·58 second hopsampled
Editorial peer review : its strengths and weaknesses (2001)Editorial peer review : its strengths and…Co-existing Notions of Research Quality: A Framework to Study Context-specific Understandings of Good Research (2019)Co-existing Notions of Resear…“Excellence R Us”: university research and the fetishisation of excellence (2017)“Excellence R Us”: university…Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the Web (2015)Web indicators for research e…From Manuscript Evaluation to Article Valuation: The Changing Technologies of Journal Peer Review (2014)From Manuscript Evaluation to…Biological Importance and Statistical Significance (2013)Biological Importance and Sta…A Labour of Love? Academics in Business Schools (2012)A Labour of Love? Academics i…Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? (2011)Impact factor: outdated artef…The ethics of scholarly peer review: a review of the literature (2010)The ethics of scholarly peer …Quality and Peer Review of Research: An Adjudicating Role for Editors (2010)Quality and Peer Review of Re…A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants (2010)A Reliability-Generalization …Rejecting and resisting Nobel class discoveries: accounts by Nobel Laureates (2009)Rejecting and resisting Nobel…Peer review of grant applications in biology and medicine. Reliability, fairness, and validity (2009)Peer review of grant applicat…The Construction of Author Voice by Editorial Board Members (2008)The Construction of Author Vo…Academic Writing and Publishing: A Practical Handbook (2008)Academic Writing and Publishi…Shaping Chinese novice scientists’ manuscripts for publication (2007)Shaping Chinese novice scient…Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions (2005)Selection of research fellows…Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2005)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)Descriptions of Sampling Practices Within Five Approaches to Qualitative Research in Education and the Health Sciences (2014)The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power (2014)Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers (2019)The Subject and Power (1982)Handbook of Qualitative Research (1994)Handbook of qualitative research (2000)Careering through academia: Securing identities or engaging ethical subjectivities? (2015)The Academic Game: Compliance and Resistance in Universities (2017)Mothers and researchers in the making: Negotiating ‘new’ motherhood within the ‘new’ academia (2018)How I Discovered Phase Contrast (1955)Resistance by Scientists to Scientific Discovery (1961)History and philosophy of the life sciences (1979)Emerging trends in peer review—a survey (2015)At what institutions did Nobel laureates do their prize-winning work? An analysis of biographical information on Nobel laureates from 1994 to 2014 (2016)How to avoid borrowed plumes in academia (2019)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing (2001)Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes (2001)The non-Anglophone scholar on the periphery of scholarly publication (2007)Publishing and learning writing for publication in English: Perspectives of NNES PhD students in science (2009)Metadiscourse in the introductions of PhD theses and research articles (2015)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Professional and citizen bibliometrics: complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators—a state-of-the-art report (2016)The application of meta-analytic (multi-level) models with multiple random effects: A systematic review (2020)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Tacit Dimension (1997)Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability. (2008)Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches (2009)The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy (2016)Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration (2023)Writing and Identity (1998)Negotiating Participation and Identity in Second Language Academic Communities (2004)An international journal’s attempts to address inequalities in academic publishing: developing a writing for publication programme (2010)Current Conceptions of Voice (2012)60th Anniversary Essay (2016)Writing and Identity (2019)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Interpreting Bibliometric Data (2021)Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review (2022)Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 (1989)Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines (1991)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Changing research on research evaluation: A critical literature review to revisit the agenda (2020)No time for that now! Qualitative changes in manuscript peer review during the Covid-19 pandemic (2020)Pygmalion in the classroom (1968)Psychological Aspects of Natural Language Use: Our Words, Our Selves (2002)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Comparative and contrastive observations on scientific titles written in English and Spanish (2010)New ways of making academic articles easier to read (2012)Titles in research articles (2022)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2011Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification?370 cited
  • 2017“Excellence R Us”: university research and the fetishisation of excellence266 cited
  • 2010A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants232 cited
  • 2012A Labour of Love? Academics in Business Schools178 cited
  • 2007Shaping Chinese novice scientists’ manuscripts for publication163 cited
  • 2019Co-existing Notions of Research Quality: A Framework to Study Context-specific Understandings of Good Research151 cited
  • 2008The Construction of Author Voice by Editorial Board Members148 cited
  • 2008Academic Writing and Publishing: A Practical Handbook136 cited
  • 2009Rejecting and resisting Nobel class discoveries: accounts by Nobel Laureates133 cited
  • 2005Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions125 cited
  • 2010The ethics of scholarly peer review: a review of the literature84 cited
  • 2014From Manuscript Evaluation to Article Valuation: The Changing Technologies of Journal Peer Review78 cited
  • 2009Peer review of grant applications in biology and medicine. Reliability, fairness, and validity77 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2015Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the Web75 cited
  • 2013Biological Importance and Statistical Significance75 cited
  • 2010Quality and Peer Review of Research: An Adjudicating Role for Editors73 cited