Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

What Do Grant Reviewers Really Want, Anyway?

3 references·8 citing·39 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1998Peer review of grant applications: what do we know?146 cited
2001Something rotten at the core of science?105 cited
1996Peer review of grant applications: a harbinger for mediocrity in clinical research?93 cited

Cited by

2018Selecting early-career researchers: the influence of discourses of internationalisation and excellence on formal and applied selection criteria in academia89 cited
2021Grant writing and grant peer review as questionable research practices23 cited
2020What makes an effective grants peer reviewer? An exploratory study of the necessary skills13 cited
2011Crafting a Sales Pitch for Your Grant Proposal10 cited
2012Bibliometric measures and National Institutes of Health funding at colleges of osteopathic medicine, 2006-2010.9 cited
2019The Role of Research Development Professionals in Supporting Team Science8 cited
2010Grant Writing Skill Building: A Business Administration Curriculum Proposal.7 cited
2015Akademiska omdömen under osäkerhet: en studie av kollektiva ankringseffekter i Vetenskapsrådets beredningsgrupper0 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work