An agency theory scale for financial services

Jon Chiew Kwee Tan · Richard Lee

26 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Services Marketing

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Customer Service Quality and Loyalty Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence Service and Product Innovation

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to draw on agency theory (AT) to develop and validate a scale to investigate customers’ loyalty towards salespersons under agency problems. Especially with credence services, customer-salesperson relationships are beset by problems that stem from personal differences and conflicts of interests. Design/methodology/approach – The context is financial investment services in Indonesia. Following Churchill’s (1979) procedure, initial qualitative surveys generated a pool of 44 items for the three AT asymmetries of risk, goal and information. Expert panel validation and exploratory factor analyses of a dataset (n= 429) confirmed a four-dimensional structure of 30 items. Finally, confirmatory factor analyses using a second dataset (n= 299) tested the effects of the four asymmetries on customer loyalty, and how the effects are moderated by customer trust and relationship duration. Findings – Overall, agency problems negatively influence customer loyalty. Information asymmetry has two discriminantly distinct dimension, quality and timeliness. Low trust amplifies the effects of all asymmetries, whereas relationship duration reduces the effects of only risk asymmetry. Comparison with a three-factor model shows that the four-factor scale is superior. Research limitations/implications – Service firms desiring long-term customer relationships need to be cognisant of potential asymmetries created by salespersons, and develop initiatives to minimise potential fallouts from each asymmetry. These include proper alignment of compensation structures, accurate and timely communications of product information, and matching risk profiles between customers and salespersons. Regular customer feedback regarding perceived asymmetries would also help early problem detection. Finally, the findings would inform the development of policy matters and industry best practices. Originality/value – Besides contributing to the small stream of research that applies AT to marketing, this study is the first to develop and validate an AT scale that incorporates all three asymmetries.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 26 citations exist upstream.

References

1981Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error 1976Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure 1988On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models 1994The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing 1988SERVQUAL: A multiple-Item Scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality 1986Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects 1979A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs 1989Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review

Cited by

2021Agency theory in marketing: 27 years on 2021Integrating Social Media and Traditional Modes of Customer Interaction for New B2B Service Development

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.