Articlegold2015

Changes in mode of travel to work: a natural experimental study of new transport infrastructure

Eva Heinen · Jenna Panter · Roger L. Mackett · David Ogilvie

112 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Urban Transport and Accessibility Transportation Planning and Optimization transportation and logistics systems

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New transport infrastructure may promote a shift towards active travel, thereby improving population health. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a major transport infrastructure project on commuters' mode of travel, trip frequency and distance travelled to work. METHODS: Quasi-experimental analysis nested within a cohort study of 470 adults working in Cambridge, UK. The intervention consisted of the opening of a guided busway with a path for walking and cycling in 2011. Exposure to the intervention was defined as the negative of the square root of the shortest distance from home to busway. The outcome measures were changes in commute mode share and number of commute trips - both based on a seven-day travel-to-work record collected before (2009) and after (2012) the intervention - and change in objective commute distance. The mode share outcomes were changes in the proportions of trips (i) involving any active travel, (ii) involving any public transport, and (iii) made entirely by car. Separate multinomial regression models were estimated adjusting for commute and sociodemographic characteristics, residential settlement size and life events. RESULTS: Proximity to the busway predicted an increased likelihood of a large (>30 %) increase in the share of commute trips involving any active travel (relative risk ratio [RRR] 1.80, 95 % CI 1.27, 2.55) and a large decrease in the share of trips made entirely by car (RRR 2.09, 95 % CI 1.35, 3.21), as well as a lower likelihood of a small (<30 %) reduction in the share of trips involving any active travel (RRR 0.47, 95 % CI 0.28, 0.81). It was not associated with changes in the share of commute trips involving any public transport, the number of commute trips, or commute distance. CONCLUSIONS: The new infrastructure promoted an increase in the share of commuting trips involving active travel and a decrease in the share made entirely by car. Further analysis will show the extent to which the changes in commute mode share were translated into an increase in time spent in active commuting and consequent health gain.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 112 citations exist upstream.

References

2010Travel and the Built Environment 2002How the built environment affects physical activity 2008Built Environment Correlates of Walking 2009Commuting by Bicycle: An Overview of the Literature 2009Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: urban land transport 2011In search of causality: a systematic review of the relationship between the built environment and physical activity among adults 2001How to score and interpret single-item health status measures: a manual for users of the SF-8™ Health Survey.2007Active commuting and cardiovascular risk: A meta-analytic review

Cited by

2024Transportation infrastructure upgrading and green development efficiency: Empirical analysis with double machine learning method 2016The Propensity to Cycle Tool: An open source online system for sustainable transport planning 2018Reductions in carbon dioxide emissions from an intervention to promote cycling and walking: A case study from New Zealand 2017A spatial econometric model for travel flow analysis and real-world applications with massive mobile phone data 2016Causal pathways linking environmental change with health behaviour change: Natural experimental study of new transport infrastructure and cycling to work

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.