Article2007

A Comparative Analysis of the Informal Workplace Learning Experiences of Three Professional Groups

2 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Innovative Education and Learning Practices Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation Organizational Learning and Leadership

Abstract

A survey was conducted to compare the informal workplace learning (IWL) experiences of three professional groups (information technologists, school teachers, and HRD professionals). Data analysis found that the three groups use interactive more than independent IWL activities. Five environmental factors inhibited engagement and nine personal characteristics enhanced engagement in IWL. Implications of these findings for theory, practice, and research in IWL are discussed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 2 citations exist upstream.

References

2008Qualitative Data Analysis 1996Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed)2003Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional learning activities 2003Learning from others at work: communities of practice and informal learning 2001Integrating learning and work: Problems and prospects 2005A survey of factors influencing the engagement of two professional groups in informal workplace learning activities 2000Environmental Inhibitors to Informal Learning in the Workplace: A Case Study of Public School Teachers 2002Critical reflective working behaviour: a survey research

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.