Utilization and expenditure at public and private facilities in 39 low‐income countries

Priyanka Saksena · Ke Xu · Riku Elovainio

81 citations0/0 files storedTropical Medicine & International Health

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Healthcare Systems and Reforms Healthcare Policy and Management Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To document the patterns of health service utilization and health payments at public and private facilities across countries. METHOD: We used data from the World Health Surveys from 39 low- and low-middle income countries to examine differences between public and private sectors. Utilization of outpatient and inpatient services, out-of-pocket payments (OOP) at public and private facilities, and transportation costs were compared. RESULTS: Utilization and payments to public and private sectors differ widely. Public facilities dominated in most countries for both outpatient and inpatient services. But, whereas use of private facilities is more common among the rich, poor people also use them, to a considerable extent and in almost all the countries in the study. The majority of OOP were incurred at public providers for inpatient services. On average, this was not the case for outpatient services. Medicines accounted for the largest share of OOP for all services except inpatient services at private facilities, where consultation fees did. Transportation costs were considerable. Price competition is certainly not the only factor that guides choice of provider. CONCLUSIONS: The results support continued efforts by the governments to engage strategically with the private sector. However, they also highlight the importance of not generalizing conditions across countries. Governments may need to reconsider simplistic user-fee abolition strategies at public providers if they simply focus on consultation fees. Policies to make health services more accessible need to consider a comprehensive benefit package that includes a wider scope of costs related to care such as expenditures on medicines and transportation.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 81 citations exist upstream.

References

2008The measurement of efficiency and productivity of health care delivery 2005Buying results? Contracting for health service delivery in developing countries 2005The private health sector in India 2007Can working with the private for-profit sector improve utilization of quality health services by the poor? A systematic review of the literature 2007The effectiveness of contracting-out primary health care services in developing countries: a review of the evidence 1998Review article. Private health care provision in developing countries: a preliminary analysis of levels and composition 2010Innovative health service delivery models in low and middle income countries - what can we learn from the private sector?2008Is Private Health Care the Answer to the Health Problems of the World's Poor?

Cited by

2013The Impact of Clinical Social Franchising on Health Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review 2019The impact of user charges on health outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review 2022A STUDY OF CATASTROPHIC HEALTH EXPENDITURES IN INDIA - EVIDENCE FROM NATIONALLY REPRESENTATIVE SURVEY DATA: 2014-2018 2021Health services utilization and out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures in public and private facilities in Pakistan: an empirical analysis of the 2013–14 OOP health expenditure survey

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.