Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Explaining Disparities between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values: Further Investigation Using Meta-Analysis

7 references·16 citing·49 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1999Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method1,295 cited
2001What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?1,003 cited
2001Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments?550 cited
1995Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive-Compatible?535 cited
2001Donation Payment Mechanisms and Contingent Valuation: An Empirical Study of Hypothetical Bias368 cited
1997Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible?264 cited
2002Provision Point Mechanisms and Field Validity Tests of Contingent Valuation234 cited

Cited by

2011Cheap Talk Scripts and Online Choice Experiments: “Looking Beyond the Mean”190 cited
2009Willingness to pay for safe drinking water: Evidence from Parral, Mexico188 cited
2009Testing the Effectiveness of Certainty Scales, Cheap Talk, and Dissonance-Minimization in Reducing Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation Studies166 cited
2021Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Conceptualisation of external validity, sources and explanations of bias and effectiveness of mitigation methods164 cited
20142013WAEA Keynote Address: Strategies for Overcoming Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Surveys161 cited
2008Public support for reducing US reliance on fossil fuels: Investigating household willingness-to-pay for energy research and development

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

154 cited

2013From Hopeless to Curious? Thoughts on Hausman's “Dubious to Hopeless” Critique of Contingent Valuation151 cited

2010Using Respondent Uncertainty to Mitigate Hypothetical Bias in a Stated Choice Experiment150 cited

2006Is hypothetical bias universal? Validating contingent valuation responses using a binding public referendum132 cited

2009A Comparison of Approaches to Mitigate Hypothetical Bias130 cited

2021Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Macro-scale analysis of literature and integrative synthesis of empirical evidence from applied economics, experimental psychology and neuroimaging128 cited

2009An Inferred Valuation Method126 cited

2009Bridging the gap between the field and the lab: Environmental goods, policy maker input, and consequentiality122 cited

2016Can you ever be certain? Reducing hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments via respondent reported choice certainty122 cited

2022The state of the art of discrete choice experiments in food research114 cited

2008Eliciting Willingness to Pay without Bias using Follow-up Certainty Statements: Comparisons between Probably/Definitely and a 10-point Certainty Scale107 cited