SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Consistency and Completeness of Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials of Primary Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplantation
16 references·0 citing·48 second hop
Consistency and Completeness of Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials of Primary Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplantation (2013)Consistency and Completeness of Reported …Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals (2012)Consolidated standards of rep…Trial Registration and Declaration of Registration by Authors of Randomized Controlled Trials (2011)Trial Registration and Declar…The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative (2011)The COMET (Core Outcome Measu…Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists (2011)Frequency and reasons for out…The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)The impact of outcome reporti…Systematic review of randomized controlled trial quality in pediatric kidney transplantation (2010)Systematic review of randomiz…Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Comparison of Registered and …Selective reporting in clinical trials: analysis of trial protocols accepted by The Lancet (2008)Selective reporting in clinic…Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors' (2008)Endorsement of the CONSORT St…OMERACT: An international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology (2007)OMERACT: An international ini…A systematic review of the quality of publications reporting coronary artery bypass grafting trials. (2007)A systematic review of the qu…Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Does the CONSORT checklist im…Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors (2005)Identifying outcome reporting…Reports of Large Immunosuppression Trials in Kidney Transplantation: Room for Improvement (2004)Reports of Large Immunosuppre…Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (2004)Outcome reporting bias in ran…Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (2021)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Publication bias in psychological science: Prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses. (2011)The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature (2012)Exploratory Research (2020)The OMERACT filter for Outcome Measures in Rheumatology. (1998)Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews (2007)Driving up the Quality and Relevance of Research Through the Use of Agreed Core Outcomes (2012)Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain (2015)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa (2012)A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an Intervention Mapping approach (2015)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials (2014)Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews (2014)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. (2015)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues (2002)Bias in Clinical Intervention Research (2006)Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents (2015)Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for Chronic Pain (2016)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review (2014)Defining and Measuring Meditation-Related Adverse Effects in Mindfulness-Based Programs (2021)Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐Analysis (2001)Meta‐Analysis Of Controlled Clinical Trials (2002)A systematic review identifies a lack of standardization in methods for handling missing variance data (2006)STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association studies (STREGA) – an extension of the STROBE statement (2009)STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA)—an extension of the STROBE statement (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 2010The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews1,133 cited
  • 2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited
  • 2012Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals739 cited
  • 2009Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials728 cited
  • 2005Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors612 cited
  • 2007OMERACT: An international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology536 cited
  • 2004Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research442 cited
  • 2008Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'241 cited
  • 2011Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists220 cited
  • 2011The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative194 cited
  • 2008Selective reporting in clinical trials: analysis of trial protocols accepted by The Lancet120 cited
  • 2007A systematic review of the quality of publications reporting coronary artery bypass grafting trials.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

39 cited
  • 2011Trial Registration and Declaration of Registration by Authors of Randomized Controlled Trials34 cited
  • 2004Reports of Large Immunosuppression Trials in Kidney Transplantation: Room for Improvement32 cited
  • 2010Systematic review of randomized controlled trial quality in pediatric kidney transplantation18 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.