References

• 2009Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward1,298 cited
• 2013The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions.697 cited
• 2004Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists578 cited
• 2005Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications482 cited
• 1995Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom368 cited
• 1998A model for case assessment and interpretation308 cited
• 2002The Daubert/Kumho Implications of Observer Effects in Forensic Science: Hidden Problems of Expectation and Suggestion290 cited
• 2008Meta‐analytically Quantifying the Reliability and Biasability of Forensic Experts177 cited
• 2003Context effects in forensic science: A review and application of the science of science to crime laboratory practice in the United States146 cited
• 2009Testing for Potential Contextual Bias Effects During the Verification Stage of the ACE‐V Methodology when Conducting Fingerprint Comparisons*116 cited
• 2009Painting the target around the matching profile: the Texas sharpshooter fallacy in forensic DNA interpretation96 cited
• 2013Practical Solutions to Cognitive and Human Factor Challenges in Forensic Science82 cited
• 2012The management of domain irrelevant context information in forensic handwriting examination casework80 cited