Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom

Bernard Robertson · G. A. Vignaux

368 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Legal processes and jurisprudence Criminal Law and Evidence Jury Decision Making Processes

Abstract

Interpreting Scientific Evidence. The Alternative Hypothesis. Explaining the Strength of Evidence. The Case as a Whole. Errors of Thinking. Classical Statistics and Database Matching. Transfer Evidence. Blood and DNA Evidence. Other Scientific Evidence. Implications for the Legal System. Conclusion. Appendix. Select Bibliography. Index.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 368 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

1998A model for case assessment and interpretation 2000The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements 2005Pronouns as a preliminary diagnostic for grouping Papuan languages 2000More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions 2003How the Probability of a False Positive Affects the Value of DNA Evidence 2003Evidence-based volcanology: application to eruption crises 2013Reliable support: Measuring calibration of likelihood ratios 2011Evidence evaluation: A response to the court of appeal judgment in R v T

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.