SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Reliable support: Measuring calibration of likelihood ratios · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleReliable support: Measuring calibration of likelihood ratios

Daniel Ramos2013

Article2013

Reliable support: Measuring calibration of likelihood ratios

Daniel Ramos · Joaquín González-Rodríguez

126 citations·0/0 files stored·Forensic Science International

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Legal processes and jurisprudence Speech Recognition and Synthesis Authorship Attribution and Profiling

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 126 citations exist upstream.

References

2007Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation 1971Elicitation of Personal Probabilities and Expectations 1983The Comparison and Evaluation of Forecasters 1996Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists 2004Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists 1998A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework 1995Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom 2000Cambridge international dictionary of English

Cited by

2016Numerical likelihood ratios outputted by LR systems are often based on extrapolation: When to stop extrapolating?2020Scientific foundations and current state of trace evidence—A review 2018An inter-laboratory evaluation of LA-ICP-MS analysis of glass and the use of a database for the interpretation of glass evidence 2021Forensic science and the principle of excluded middle: “Inconclusive” decisions and the structure of error rate studies 2020Defence against the modern arts: the curse of statistics—Part II: ‘Score-based likelihood ratios’

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2013Information‐Theoretical Assessment of the Performance of Likelihood Ratio Computation Methodsarticle · 5 shared references 2016Current perspectives in the interpretation of gunshot residues in forensic science: A reviewreview · 5 shared references 2016Bayes and the Lawreview · 5 shared references 2006An extended likelihood ratio framework for interpreting evidencearticle · 5 shared references 2011Forensic science – A true science?article · 5 shared references 2011If the Shoe Fits They Might Acquit: The Value of Forensic Science Testimonyarticle · 5 shared references

Details

Year2013

Typearticle

Published2013-05-09

VenueForensic Science International

ISSN-L0379-0738

Languageen

Citations126

Files0 public / 0

ShelfLegal processes and jurisprudence

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.04.014

openalex_workW1994967892

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2022The strange persistence of (source) “identification” claims in forensic literature through descriptivism, diagnosticism and machinism

2021Measuring calibration of likelihood-ratio systems: A comparison of four metrics, including a new metric devPAV

2023From specific-source feature-based to common-source score-based likelihood-ratio systems: ranking the stars