Correlations of cognitive reflection with judgments and choices

Guillermo Campitelli · Martín Labollita

167 citations0/0 files storedJudgment and Decision Making

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics Cognitive Abilities and Testing Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Abstract

Abstract We investigated the role of individual differences in cognitive reflection in decision making. We measured the performance of 157 participants in the cognitive reflection test (Frederick, 2005) and a number of decision-making tasks. We examined the relation of cognitive reflection with performance in tasks that assess correspondence (as distinct from coherence), such as predicting the ratings of chess players. We found significant correlations between cognitive reflection and all the estimation measures in correspondence tasks. Our results suggest that cognitive reflection is a thinking disposition that includes more characteristics than originally proposed by Frederick (2005). We proposed that cognitive reflection is related to the concept of actively open-minded thinking (Baron, 1985, 2008). We concluded that cognitive reflection is a thinking disposition that interacts with knowledge, domain-specific heuristics and characteristics of the environment and that it may play an essential role in the adaptation of the decision maker to different environments and situations.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 167 citations exist upstream.

References

1974Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases 1975Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases 2019Theory of games and economic behavior 1955A BEHAVIORAL MODEL OF RATIONAL CHOICE 2005Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making 2007Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition 2000Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?1983Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.

Cited by

2018Belief in Fake News is Associated with Delusionality, Dogmatism, Religious Fundamentalism, and Reduced Analytic Thinking 2019Belief in fake news is associated with delusionality, dogmatism, religious fundamentalism, and reduced analytic thinking.2013The Relation Between Intelligence and Religiosity 2015Going against the Herd: Psychological and Cultural Factors Underlying the ‘Vaccination Confidence Gap’2019Cognitive reflection test: Whom, how, when

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.