Investor Overconfidence and Trading Volume

Meir Statman · Steven R. Thorley · Keith Vorkink

975 citations0/0 files storedReview of Financial Studies

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Financial Markets and Investment Strategies Corporate Finance and Governance Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Abstract

High market-wide returns make some investors overconfident because they incorrectly attribute the gains to their stock picking talents. Investors who are subject to biased self-attribution increase their trading in subsequent periods in models by Gervais and Odean (2001) and Odean (1998a). We use a vector autoregressive and impulse-response function methodology to investigate the trading volume implication of the overconfidence hypothesis. We find empirical support for the overconfidence hypothesis as well as the disposition affect of Shefrin and Statman (1985). Specifically, market-wide trading activity in NYSE/AMEX shares is positively correlated to past shocks in market return, with the turnover response lasting months and perhaps years. This increase (decrease) in market-wide trading activity subsequent to bull (bear) markets can be explained by either the overconfidence hypothesis or the disposition effect. Vector autoregressions on individual stocks indicate that volume responds to past shocks in individual security return, which prior researchers have interpreted as evidence of disposition effect trading. However, we show that individual security trading activity is even more responsive to past shocks in the market-wide return, which we interpret as evidence of the overconfidence hypothesis. The empirical lead-lag relationships between returns and trading activity as measured by turnover are both statistically and economically significant and an important empirical characteristic of the domestic equity market. The trading volume patterns we document are in addition to well-known volume-volatility relationships and turn-of-the-year effects, and are robust to a number of specification alternatives.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 975 citations exist upstream.

References

1979Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk 1988Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk 1993Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds 1988Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression 1993Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency 1985Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading 1997Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation 1981The relationship between return and market value of common stocks

Cited by

2010An empirical analysis of herd behavior in global stock markets 2008Presidential Address: The Cost of Active Investing 2009Stock market liquidity and firm value☆2012Social Media and Firm Equity Value 2015Behavioral Finance 2007Do Investors Overweight Personal Experience? Evidence from IPO Subscriptions

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.