Conceptual and Empirical Challenges in the Study of Firm Growth

Abstract

When the first author reviewed the literature on small firm growth in the mid-1980s for his dissertation, he noted that surprisingly few studies had focused on that specific problem. Today, this is no longer true. In recent years ever more comprehensive lists of studies have been compiled and reviewed. Storey compiled results from more than twenty-five studies. Delmar scrutinized the operationalizations of growth in fifty-five studies. The second author of this chapter recently reviewed and classified close to seventy studies for his dissertation, while Ardishvili et al. included in their classification a full 105 published and unpublished studies focusing on new venture growth. However, rather than presenting a set of solid generalizations on the causes and effects of growth, these reviewers all tend to come up with relatively critical accounts concerning both theoretical and methodological shortcomings.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 295 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.