Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Tolerable or Acceptable: A Comparison of Risk Regulation in the United Kingdom and in the Netherlands

2 references·16 citing·46 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1999Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk‐Assessment Battlefield1,896 cited
2000Factors in Risk Perception1,559 cited

Cited by

2018How Safe Is Safe Enough for Self‐Driving Vehicles?154 cited
2011ALARP—What does it really mean?125 cited
2013Past, present and future of Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) and the incentive it obtained from Land-Use Planning (LUP)112 cited
2018The Need for Hierarchies of Acceptance Criteria for Probabilistic Risk Assessments in Fire Engineering99 cited
2015ALARP and CBA all in the same game72 cited
2016The Evolution of Process Safety: Current Status and Future Direction67 cited
2013How Solid Is the Dutch (and the British) National Risk Assessment? Overview and Decision‐Theoretic Evaluation65 cited
2012Ethics and fundamental principles of risk acceptance criteria63 cited
2006Risk-maps informing land-use planning processes58 cited
2020On the importance of systems thinking when using the ALARP principle for risk management52 cited
2017A socio-technical system framework for risk-informed performance-based building regulation51 cited
2018The ALARP Principle in the Cost-Benefit Analysis for the Acceptability of Investment Risk48 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2017Using the ALARP principle for safety management in the energy production sector of chemical industry47 cited

2013Compact City Development and the Challenge of Environmental Policy Integration: A Multi‐Level Governance Perspective44 cited

2019Defining ALARP for fire safety engineering design via the Life Quality Index38 cited

2014Risk Criteria in Occupational Environments: Critical Overview and Discussion33 cited