SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A peek behind the curtain: Peer review and editorial decision making at S troke
16 references·1 citing·58 second hop
A peek behind the curtain: Peer review and editorial decision making at S troke (2014)A peek behind the curtain: Peer review an…Gender Differences in Publication Productivity, Academic Position, Career Duration, and Funding Among U.S. Academic Radiation Oncology Faculty (2014)Gender Differences in Publica…Effect of English Proficiency and Research Funding on Acceptance of Submitted Articles to Stroke Journal (2014)Effect of English Proficiency…When peers are not peers and don't know it: The Dunning‐Kruger effect and self‐fulfilling prophecy in peer‐review (2013)When peers are not peers and …Substantial Agreement of Referee Recommendations at a General Medical Journal – A Peer Review Evaluation at Deutsches Ärzteblatt International (2013)Substantial Agreement of Refe…Clinical Agreement in Quantitative Measurements (2013)Clinical Agreement in Quantit…Big Science vs. Little Science: How Scientific Impact Scales with Funding (2013)Big Science vs. Little Scienc…Selecting the right journal for your submission. (2012)Selecting the right journal f…Transparency showcases strength of peer review (2010)Transparency showcases streng…Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care? (2010)Editorial Peer Reviewers' Rec…Publication Bias in Orthopaedic Research: An Analysis of Scientific Factors Associated with Publication in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) (2008)Publication Bias in Orthopaed…Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? (2000)Reproducibility of peer revie…Reliability: What is it, and how is it measured? (2000)Reliability: What is it, and …Reliability of Editors' Subjective Quality Ratings of Peer Reviews of Manuscripts (1998)Reliability of Editors' Subje…Peer review and editorial decision-making (1998)Peer review and editorial dec…Policies, practices, and attitudes of north american medical journal editors (1995)Policies, practices, and atti…Guarding the Guardians: A Conference on Editorial Peer Review (1986)Guarding the Guardians: A Con…Can journal reviewers dependably assess rigour, significance, and originality in theoretical papers? Evidence from physics (2023)Can journal reviewers dependa…The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex (1871)The descent of man and selection in relation to sex (1907)The Dunning–Kruger Effect (2011)The impact of work integrated learning on student work-readiness (2014)The Dunning-Kruger Effect in a workplace computing setting (2017)Forensic Anthropology as a Discipline (2021)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Statistical Methods For Assessing Measurement Error (Reliability) in Variables Relevant to Sports Medicine (1998)Statistical Methods Used to Test for Agreement of Medical Instruments Measuring Continuous Variables in Method Comparison Studies: A Systematic Review (2012)The Case for Using the Repeatability Coefficient When Calculating Test–Retest Reliability (2013)The Coefficient of Variation as an Index of Measurement Reliability (2013)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Complication Reporting in Orthopaedic Trials (2009)Cost-Effectiveness Analyses in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (2014)Current Status of Cost Utility Analyses in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review (2014)Agreement among reviewers of review articles (1991)Validation of an index of the quality of review articles (1991)Multiple blinded reviews of the same two manuscripts. Effects of referee characteristics and publication language (1994)ORI Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research (2004)Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability. (2008)A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants (2010)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Evaluation, Policy Learning and Evidence‐Based Policy Making (2002)Incentives and creativity: evidence from the academic life sciences (2011)How to Receive More Funding for Your Research? Get Connected to the Right People! (2015)Which gender gap? Factors affecting researchers’ scientific impact in science and medicine (2016)TALENT VERSUS LUCK: THE ROLE OF RANDOMNESS IN SUCCESS AND FAILURE (2018)Journal Peer Review (1985)The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial. (1990)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (1992)Let’s make peer review scientific (2016)Scholarly Consensus and Journal Rejection Rates (1988)Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. (2005)Emerging trends in peer review—a survey (2015)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Responsible Conduct of Research (2022)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)A Five-Item Measure of Socially Desirable Response Set (1989)The Effects of Blinding on the Quality of Peer Review (1990)Is There a Sex Bias in Choosing Editors? (1998)The Representation of Women on the Editorial Boards of Major Medical Journals: A 35-Year Perspective (2008)Women are underrepresented on the editorial boards of journals in environmental biology and natural resource management (2014)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Mentoring in Academic Medicine (2006)Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students (2012)Publication Productivity and Experience: Factors Associated with Academic Rank Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty in the United States (2016)Mentorship in Medicine and Other Health Professions (2018)Impact of Mentoring on Academic Career Success for Women in Medicine: A Systematic Review (2021)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Ranking Games (2014)Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000Reliability: What is it, and how is it measured?749 cited
  • 2000Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone?254 cited
  • 2014Gender Differences in Publication Productivity, Academic Position, Career Duration, and Funding Among U.S. Academic Radiation Oncology Faculty205 cited
  • 2013Big Science vs. Little Science: How Scientific Impact Scales with Funding189 cited
  • 2010Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care?177 cited
  • 1986Guarding the Guardians: A Conference on Editorial Peer Review154 cited
  • 1998Reliability of Editors' Subjective Quality Ratings of Peer Reviews of Manuscripts122 cited
  • 2008Publication Bias in Orthopaedic Research: An Analysis of Scientific Factors Associated with Publication in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume)99 cited
  • 1995Policies, practices, and attitudes of north american medical journal editors77 cited
  • 2013When peers are not peers and don't know it: The Dunning‐Kruger effect and self‐fulfilling prophecy in peer‐review71 cited
  • 2010Transparency showcases strength of peer review64 cited
  • 1998Peer review and editorial decision-making43 cited
  • 2013Clinical Agreement in Quantitative Measurements33 cited
  • 2013

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Substantial Agreement of Referee Recommendations at a General Medical Journal – A Peer Review Evaluation at Deutsches Ärzteblatt International
32 cited
  • 2014Effect of English Proficiency and Research Funding on Acceptance of Submitted Articles to Stroke Journal19 cited
  • 2012Selecting the right journal for your submission.19 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Can journal reviewers dependably assess rigour, significance, and originality in theoretical papers? Evidence from physics7 cited