SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Should systematic reviews include searches for published errata?
7 references·3 citing·41 second hop
Should systematic reviews include searches for published errata? (2004)Should systematic reviews include searche…Problems With Indexing and Citation of Articles With Group Authorship (2002)Problems With Indexing and Ci…Development of The Cochrane Collaboration's Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials (2002)Development of The Cochrane C…Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998 (2001)Quality of Cochrane reviews: …The Medical Review Article Revisited: Has the Science Improved? (1999)The Medical Review Article Re…Effects of article retraction on citation and practice in medicine. (1999)Effects of article retraction…Phenomena of Retraction (1998)Phenomena of RetractionThe Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)The Medical Review Article: S…Errata for trial publications are not uncommon, are frequently not trivial, and can be challenging to access: a retrospective review (2019)Errata for trial publications…Retractions, press releases and newspaper coverage (2007)Retractions, press releases a…Meta-Analysis in Library and Information Science: Method, History, and Recommendations for Reporting Research (2006)Meta-Analysis in Library and …The integrity of the scientific literature (1987)The Continued Use of Retracted, Invalid Scientific Literature (1990)Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings (2012)Visibility of retractions: a cross-sectional one-year study (2013)What Studies of Retractions Tell Us (2014)Reporting research in medical journals and newspapers (1995)Press Releases (2002)Recommendations from the Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: Shaping a Research and Implementation Agenda Project (2021)The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health Care (1993)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Beyond MEDLINE for Literature Searches (2003)Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group (2003)SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Methodologic Issues in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (2003)The process of systematic review and its application in agri-food public-health (2006)The Value of “Traditional” Reviews in the Era of Systematic Reviewing (2009)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate (1992)Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (2015)Correlation Between Perception-Based Journal Rankings and the Journal Impact Factor (JIF): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2017)Reviews and Reviewing: Approaches to Research Synthesis. An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper (2023)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Growth and decentralization of the medical literature: implications for evidence-based medicine. (2005)High prevalence but low impact of data extraction and reporting errors were found in Cochrane systematic reviews (2005)Risk of bias in overviews of reviews: a scoping review of methodological guidance and four‐item checklist (2017)Characterization of Published Errors in High-Impact Oncology Journals (2011)Errata in Medical Publications (2014)Top 50 cited articles on Covid-19 after the first year of the pandemic: A bibliometric analysis (2021)Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Publication of clinical trials: accountability and accessibility (2004)Determining authorship in multicenter trials: a systematic review (2011)Brazilian Science between National and Foreign Journals: Methodology for Analyzing the Production and Impact in Emerging Scientific Communities (2016)The "impact factor" revisited (2005)The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science (2013)Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1987The Medical Review Article: State of the Science857 cited
  • 1998Phenomena of Retraction230 cited
  • 2002Development of The Cochrane Collaboration's Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials197 cited
  • 2001Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998159 cited
  • 1999The Medical Review Article Revisited: Has the Science Improved?152 cited
  • 1999Effects of article retraction on citation and practice in medicine.101 cited
  • 2002Problems With Indexing and Citation of Articles With Group Authorship37 cited

Cited by

  • 2006Meta-Analysis in Library and Information Science: Method, History, and Recommendations for Reporting Research27 cited
  • 2007Retractions, press releases and newspaper coverage14 cited
  • 2019Errata for trial publications are not uncommon, are frequently not trivial, and can be challenging to access: a retrospective review13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work