SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
DO EMERGING DONORS ALLOCATE AID AS DAC MEMBERS DO? THE CASE OF KOREA IN THE MILLENNIUM ERA
16 references·9 citing·33 second hop
DO EMERGING DONORS ALLOCATE AID AS DAC MEMBERS DO? THE CASE OF KOREA IN THE MILLENNIUM ERA (2012)DO EMERGING DONORS ALLOCATE AID AS DAC ME…Governance Matters VIII: Aggregate And Individual Governance Indicators 1996-2008 (2009)Governance Matters VIII: Aggr…Will ‘Emerging Donors’ Change the Face of International Co‐operation? (2006)Will ‘Emerging Donors’ Change…Bilateral Donors’ Interest vs. Recipients’ Development Motives in Aid Allocation: Do All Donors Behave the Same? (2006)Bilateral Donors’ Interest vs…The Increasing Selectivity of Foreign Aid, 1984–2002 (2004)The Increasing Selectivity of…Development Effectiveness: What have We Learnt? (2004)Development Effectiveness: Wh…Bilateral donors' aid allocation decisions—a three-dimensional panel analysis (2003)Bilateral donors' aid allocat…Effective Aid: How Democracy Allows Development Aid to Improve the Quality of Life (2002)Effective Aid: How Democracy …Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid? (2002)Do Corrupt Governments Receiv…Aid allocation and poverty reduction (2002)Aid allocation and poverty re…Growth is Good for the Poor (2001)Growth is Good for the PoorWho Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why? (2000)Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom…Assessing Aid: What Works, What Doesn't, and Why (1999)Assessing Aid: What Works, Wh…Estimating Aid-Allocation Criteria with Panel Data (1994)Estimating Aid-Allocation Cri…Motivations for aid to developing countries (1984)Motivations for aid to develo…The US Aid Relationship: A Test of the Recipient Need and the Donor Interest Models (1979)The US Aid Relationship: A Te…Aid, Policies, and GrowthAid, Policies, and GrowthThe role of aid bureaucracy heads: evidence from the allocation of Korean aid (2025)The role of aid bureaucracy h…What motivates South Korean Official Development Assistance? (2024)What motivates South Korean O…How bureaucratic competition shapes foreign aid allocation: The case of South Korea's aid agencies (2024)How bureaucratic competition …Do less populous countries receive more development assistance for health per capita? Longitudinal evidence for 143 countries, 1990–2014 (2018)Do less populous countries re…The Benefits of Unification Failure: Re-examining the Evolution of Economic Cooperation in Japan (2016)The Benefits of Unification F…Why don’t donor countries coordinate their aid? A case study of European donors in Morocco (2015)Why don’t donor countries coo…Comparison of Aid Allocation Patterns of Two Emerging Donors: Korea and Greece (2015)Comparison of Aid Allocation …An Empirical Study on China's Foreign Aid Policy and Its Impact on Air Pollution in Sub-Saharan Africa (2015)An Empirical Study on China's…Development Effectiveness of the Paris Declaration: An Empirical Evaluation (2013)Development Effectiveness of …A Foreign Policy Model of U.S. Bilateral Aid Allocation (1977)Uses and Abuses of Governance Indicators (2006)The Politics of Perception: Use and Abuse of Transparency International's Approach to Measuring Corruption (2009)Need, Merit, or Self‐Interest—What Determines the Allocation of Aid? (2011)Foreign Assistance and Economic Development (1967)North-South: A Programme for Survival (1981)The behaviour of the maximum likelihood estimator of limited dependent variable models in the presence of fixed effects (2004)Development Aid and Economic Growth: A Positive Long-Run Relation (2009)Are ‘New’ Donors Different? Comparing the Allocation of Bilateral Aid Between nonDAC and DAC Donor Countries (2011)Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models (1995)Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models (1995)Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models (1998)Finance, inequality and the poor (2007)The Fundamental Institutions of China's Reforms and Development (2011)Redistribution, Inequality, and Growth (2014)INSTITUTIONS AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE: CROSS‐COUNTRY TESTS USING ALTERNATIVE INSTITUTIONAL MEASURES (1995)Does Trade Cause Growth? (1999)Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy (2003)Can Foreign Aid Buy Growth? (2003)Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration (1995)Politics and the effectiveness of foreign aid (1996)Aid and growth regressions (2001)Estimating Dynamic State Preferences from United Nations Voting Data (2013)US Food Aid and Civil Conflict (2014)A SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF CROSS-COUNTRY GROWTH REGRESSIONS (1991)Aid effectiveness disputed (2000)The Performance Paradox in the Public Sector (2002)Valuing Freedoms (2002)Foreign Aid, Institutions, and Governance in Sub‐Saharan Africa (2004)Aid and Growth: What Does the Cross-Country Evidence Really Show? (2008)Political connections and the cost of equity capital (2012)Regional Governance Matters: Quality of Government within European Union Member States (2013)What Is Governance? (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • n.d.Aid, Policies, and Growth4,010 cited
  • 2001Growth is Good for the Poor2,716 cited
  • 2000Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why?2,585 cited
  • 2009Governance Matters VIII: Aggregate And Individual Governance Indicators 1996-20081,843 cited
  • 2002Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid?1,062 cited
  • 2002Aid allocation and poverty reduction970 cited
  • 1984Motivations for aid to developing countries706 cited
  • 2006Bilateral Donors’ Interest vs. Recipients’ Development Motives in Aid Allocation: Do All Donors Behave the Same?624 cited
  • 1999Assessing Aid: What Works, What Doesn't, and Why588 cited
  • 2003Bilateral donors' aid allocation decisions—a three-dimensional panel analysis453 cited
  • 2002Effective Aid: How Democracy Allows Development Aid to Improve the Quality of Life392 cited
  • 1979The US Aid Relationship: A Test of the Recipient Need and the Donor Interest Models340 cited
  • 2006Will ‘Emerging Donors’ Change the Face of International Co‐operation?338 cited
  • 2004Development Effectiveness: What have We Learnt?314 cited
  • 2004The Increasing Selectivity of Foreign Aid, 1984–2002293 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 1994Estimating Aid-Allocation Criteria with Panel Data289 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2015Why don’t donor countries coordinate their aid? A case study of European donors in Morocco15 cited
    • 2018Do less populous countries receive more development assistance for health per capita? Longitudinal evidence for 143 countries, 1990–20147 cited
    • 2016The Benefits of Unification Failure: Re-examining the Evolution of Economic Cooperation in Japan6 cited
    • 2025The role of aid bureaucracy heads: evidence from the allocation of Korean aid2 cited
    • 2024What motivates South Korean Official Development Assistance?2 cited
    • 2015Comparison of Aid Allocation Patterns of Two Emerging Donors: Korea and Greece2 cited
    • 2015An Empirical Study on China's Foreign Aid Policy and Its Impact on Air Pollution in Sub-Saharan Africa2 cited
    • 2024How bureaucratic competition shapes foreign aid allocation: The case of South Korea's aid agencies1 cited
    • 2013Development Effectiveness of the Paris Declaration: An Empirical Evaluation1 cited