Employing generalized audit software in the financial services sector

Roger S. Debreceny · Sook‐Leng Lee · Willy. Neo · Jocelyn Shuling. Toh

133 citations0/0 files storedManagerial Auditing Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance Decision Support System Applications Robotic Process Automation Applications

Abstract

Purpose Computer assisted audit techniques (CAATs) encompass a range of computerized techniques that internal and external auditors use to facilitate their audit objectives. One of the most important CAATs is generalized audit software (GAS), which is a class of packaged software that allows auditors to interrogate a variety of databases, application software and other sources and then conduct analyzes and audit routines on the extracted or live data. This study seeks to evaluate the nature and extent of the utilization of CAATs in financial institutions. In particular, the study establishes the extent and nature of use of GAS by bank internal auditors and their external auditors. The study is conducted with large local and international commercial banks in Singapore, a major financial center. Given the limited research on GAS in general and in the financial services sector in particular, the study uses exploratory qualitative research. Design/methodology/approach Qualitative research employing depth interviews with internal and external auditors of financial institutions. Finding The research finds that the extent and range of use of GAS varies widely between the institutions in the sample. Internal auditors see GAS primarily as a tool for special investigations rather than as a foundation for their regular audit work. External auditors make no use of GAS, citing the inapplicability of this class of tool to the nature of testing the financial statement assertions or the extent or quality of computerized internal controls maintained by the bank. Research limitations/implications This is a small sample study. While the data are rich, the findings cannot necessarily be extrapolated to broader populations. Practical implications This study provides guidance on the role that CAATs play in the audit process of financial institutions that is relevant for the audit community. Originality/value This is the first in‐depth study of the application of CAATs to financial institutions.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 133 citations exist upstream.

References

1989Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research 1988The Long Interview 1994The methodology of Focus Groups: the importance of interaction between research participants 1997The Delphi Method?2002Continuous Auditing: Building Automated Auditing Capability 2003Computer‐assisted audit tools and techniques: analysis and perspectives 2004Bank Management and Financial Services 2000Auditing: Assurance and Risk

Cited by

2012The utilisation of generalized audit software (GAS) by external auditors 2014Eight Issues on Audit Data Analytics We Would Like Researched 2021Embedding process mining into financial statement audits 2012Factors Influencing Audit Technology Acceptance by Audit Firms: A New I-TOE Adoption Framework 2019Determinants adoption of computer-assisted auditing tools (CAATs)2014Modeling voluntary CAAT utilization decisions in auditing

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.