Public attitudes to the principles of sentencing

Mike Hough · J.V. Roberts · Jessica Jacobson

48 citations0/0 files storedBIROn (Birkbeck, University of London)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Criminal Justice and Penology Criminal Law and Policy Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis

Abstract

shaped by the mistaken belief that the courts are lenient.Any attempt to accommodate public opinion on sentencing principles will achieve little until these misperceptions about current practice are addressed.x

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 48 citations exist upstream.

References

2002Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and Courts 2003Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and the Effective Rule of Law 2005PUNISHMENT, COMMUNICATION AND COMMUNITY 1968Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law 201710. Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice 2005Understanding Public Attitudes to Criminal Justice 1996Americans View Crime and Justice: A National Public Opinion Survey 1999Sentencing Trends in Britain

Cited by

2018Personalizing the State 2011Putting the offender back into sentencing: An empirical study of the public’s understanding of personal mitigation 2016Measuring jurors’ views on sentencing: Results from the second Australian jury sentencing study 2017Why sentence? Comparing the views of jurors, judges and the legislature on the purposes of sentencing in Victoria, Australia

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.