References

• 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
• 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
• 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
• 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement19,577 cited
• 2005The Kappa Statistic in Reliability Studies: Use, Interpretation, and Sample Size Requirements4,093 cited
• 2011GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)2,798 cited
• 2011GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency2,318 cited
• 2009AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews1,756 cited
• 2010Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses805 cited
• 1991Validation of an index of the quality of review articles788 cited
• 1998Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses534 cited
• 2003The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews499 cited
• 1988Guidelines for reading literature reviews.492 cited
• 2006Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews